首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Fuel Cell Science and Technology >Cogeneration of Heat and Electricity: A Comparison of Gas Turbine, Internal Combustion Engine, and MCFC/GT Hybrid System Alternatives
【24h】

Cogeneration of Heat and Electricity: A Comparison of Gas Turbine, Internal Combustion Engine, and MCFC/GT Hybrid System Alternatives

机译:热电联产:燃气轮机,内燃机和MCFC / GT混合动力系统替代方案的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The purpose of this paper is to present the results of a feasibility study of the supply ofnelectricity and heat to a large user (i.e., a public hospital in Northern Italy) by means ofna molten carbonate fuel cell (MCFC) hybrid system in comparison with other technologies.nThe study investigated three alternative options in order to meet the user’s demand:ninternal combustion engine, gas turbine, and a hybrid system (molten carbonate fuel cellsnand gas turbine, MCFC-HS), which is currently under development by Ansaldo Fuel CellnLtd. and ENEA. The user requirement was the yearly supplies of 6.65 GWhe / year andn21.64 GWhth / year. Due to demand fluctuations over the year, integration by electric gridnand/or additional thermal boilers was also required and investigated. The approachnintegrates the usual mass balance with large scale material flow accounting, embodiednenergy analysis, exergy efficiency, and emergy synthesis, within a LCA perspective. Resultsnshow that the best performance from the point of view of energy and exergy efficiencynis shown by the MCFC-hybrid system. The latter is also characterized by thenlowest embodied energy demand and cumulative material demand as well as by thenlowest requirement for direct and indirect environmental support (emergy method). However,nthe small thermal energy supply of the MCFC-HS compared with the large thermalnneeds of the hospital calls for a larger use of the additional boiler. The latter devicenworsens the local-scale emissions of the system, compared with the other alternativesninvestigated. Results point out that a proper choice cannot only be based on the individualnperformance of an even well performing technological device, but also needs to bentailored on the system’s characteristics and dynamics, in order to adequately matchnsupply and demand.
机译:本文的目的是介绍通过熔融碳酸盐燃料电池(MCFC)混合系统向大型用户(即意大利北部的公立医院)供电和供热的可行性研究结果,并与其他方法进行比较。为了满足用户的需求,本研究调查了三种替代方案:内燃机,燃气轮机和混合系统(熔融碳酸盐燃料电池和燃气轮机,MCFC-HS),目前由Ansaldo Fuel CellnLtd开发。和ENEA。用户需求是每年6.65 GWhe /年和n21.64 GWhth /年的年供应量。由于一年中需求波动,也需要并通过电网和/或其他热锅炉进行集成。该方法在LCA的视角下,将通常的质量平衡与大规模的物料流核算,体现的能量分析,能效效率和能值综合相结合。结果表明,从能量和火用效率的角度来看,最佳性能表现在MCFC混合系统上。后者的特征还在于最低的实际能源需求和累积的材料需求,以及对直接和间接环境支持(能源方法)的最低需求。但是,与医院的大量热需求相比,MCFC-HS的热能供应量较小,因此需要更多地使用附加锅炉。与其他已调查的替代方案相比,后一种装置无法提高系统的局部排放量。结果指出,适当的选择不仅要基于性能良好的技术设备的个性化性能,而且还需要充分考虑系统的特性和动态特性,以便充分匹配供应和需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号