首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Forestry >A Comparison of Residual Stand Damage along Yarding Trails in a Group Selection Harvest Using Four Different Yarding Methods
【24h】

A Comparison of Residual Stand Damage along Yarding Trails in a Group Selection Harvest Using Four Different Yarding Methods

机译:四种不同堆场方法在群选收成中沿堆场径对林分残留的危害比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A study of residual stand damage along yarding trails associated with four harvest methods - harvester/forwarder, and cable skidder, tractor, and bulldozer with chainsaw felling - was conducted in a group selection harvest of a mixed hardwood stand in Maine. Bulldozer yarding was associated with the largest number of damaged trees per 100 m of trail length and the largest number of damaged trees per 1 00 m2 of near-trail space. The smallest number of damaged trees was associated with the forwarder method. The tractor method resulted in the most root damage, and the forwarder method resulted in the largest trail width. These results have implications for equipment selection and the planning of harvests and harvest access systems. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
机译:在缅因州的一种混合硬木林分群采收中,对与四种采伐方法(收割机/货运代理,电缆打滑机,拖拉机和推土机和电锯砍伐)相关的沿堆放场的剩余林分损害进行了研究。推土机堆放与每100 m步道长度上受损树木数量最多和每1 00 m2的近步道空间内受损树木数量最多相关。最少数量的受损树木与转发器方法相关。拖拉机方法造成的根部损伤最大,而转发器方法导致的履带宽度最大。这些结果对设备的选择以及收割和收割进入系统的规划有影响。 [出版物摘要]

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Forestry》 |2010年第3期|p.109-109|共1页
  • 作者

    Anonymous;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号