...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Forestry Research >Comparison of two approaches for detecting the depth of edge influence on vegetation diversity in the arid valley of southwestern China
【24h】

Comparison of two approaches for detecting the depth of edge influence on vegetation diversity in the arid valley of southwestern China

机译:两种检测西南干旱谷边缘对植被多样性影响深度的方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Three types of landscape boundary (forest/pepper field, forest/cabbage field, and forest/grassland) were selected in the arid valley of upper reaches of Minjiang River, southwestern China. On the basis of vegetation diversity, the depth of edge influence (DEI) on different types of landscape boundaries was estimated using principal components analysis (PCA) method and moving split-window techniques (MSWT). The results showed that in the 5 transects, PCA method was able to detect the edge influence depth with 3 transects, while MSWT could explain 4 transects. It is concluded that PCA and MSWT both can be used to detect the depth of edge influence within 50 m from the edge to the interior. Similar conclusions were drawn in the forest of each transect with the two methods, but no similar conclusions were drawn in the pepper field of each transect. Although the two methods have advantages and disadvantages respectively, they are useful tools for characterizing edge dynamics. Comparing the two methods, MSWT is more successful.
机译:在中国西南Min江上游干旱河谷,选择了三种类型的景观边界(森林/胡椒田,森林/白菜田和森林/草原)。基于植被多样性,利用主成分分析(PCA)方法和移动分割窗口技术(MSWT)估算了不同类型景观边界的边缘影响深度(DEI)。结果表明,在5个样点中,PCA方法可以检测3个样点的边缘影响深度,而MSWT可以解释4个样点。结论是PCA和MSWT均可用于检测从边缘到内部50 m内边缘影响的深度。两种方法在每个样带的森林中得出类似的结论,但在每个样带的胡椒田中没有得出类似的结论。尽管这两种方法分别具有优点和缺点,但它们是表征边缘动力学的有用工具。比较这两种方法,MSWT更成功。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号