首页> 外文期刊>Journal of food protection >Internalization of bacterial pathogens in tomatoes and their control by selected chemicals.
【24h】

Internalization of bacterial pathogens in tomatoes and their control by selected chemicals.

机译:番茄中细菌病原体的内在化及其通过某些化学品的控制。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The effect of different washing or sanitizing agents was compared for preventing or reducing surface and internal contamination of tomatoes by Salmonella Typhimurium and Escherichia coli O157:H7. The tomatoes were inoculated by dipping them in a bacterial suspension containing approximately 6.0 log CFU/ml of each pathogen and then rinsing them with tap water, hypochlorite solution (250 mg/liter), or lactic acid solution (2%, wt/vol). All treatments were applied by dipping or spraying, and solutions were applied at 5, 25, 35, and 55 degrees C. With the exception of the lactic acid dip at 5 degrees C, all treatments reduced both pathogens on the surfaces of the tomatoes by at least 2.9 cycles. No significantly different results were obtained (P > 0.05) with the dipping and spraying techniques. For internalized pathogens, the mean counts for tomatoes treated with water alone or with chlorine ranged from 0.8 to 2.1 log CFU/g. In contrast, after lactic acid spray treatment, all core samples of tomatoes tested negative for Salmonella Typhimurium and, except for one sample with a low but detectable count, all samples tested negative for E. coli O157:H7 with a plate count method. When the absence of pathogens was verified by an enrichment method, Salmonella was not recovered from any samples, whereas two of four samples tested positive for E. coli O157:H7 even though the counts were negative. Few cells of internalized pathogens were able to survive in the center of the tomato during storage at room temperature (25 to 28 degrees C). The average superficial pH of tomatoes treated with tap water, chlorine, or lactic acid was 4.9 to 5.2, 4.1 to 4.3, and 2.5, respectively (P < 0.05), whereas no differences were observed in the internal pH (3.6 to 3.7) of the tomatoes treated with different sanitizers. The general practice in the tomato industry is to wash the tomatoes in chlorinated water. However, chlorine is rapidly degraded by organic matter usually present in produce. Therefore, lactic acid sprays may be a moreeffective alternative for decontaminating tomato surfaces. The use of warm (55 degrees C) sprays could reduce pathogen internalization during washing.
机译:为了防止或减少鼠伤寒沙门氏菌和大肠杆菌O157:H7对番茄的表面和内部污染,比较了不同清洗剂或消毒剂的效果。将西红柿浸入含有约6.0 log CFU / ml每种病原体的细菌悬浮液中,然后用自来水,次氯酸盐溶液(250 mg /升)或乳酸溶液(2%,wt / vol)冲洗,从而对西红柿进行接种。所有处理均通过浸入或喷雾进行,溶液分别在5、25、35和55摄氏度下使用。除了5摄氏度的乳酸浸入外,所有处理均可通过以下方法减少西红柿表面的两种病原体:至少2.9个周期。浸渍和喷涂技术未获得明显不同的结果(P> 0.05)。对于内在的病原体,仅用水或用氯处理的番茄的平均计数范围为0.8至2.1 log CFU / g。相反,经过乳酸喷雾处理后,番茄的所有核心样品的鼠伤寒沙门氏菌均呈阴性,除了一个计数低但可检测的样品外,所有样品的大肠杆菌O157:H7均呈平板计数法呈阴性。当通过富集方法确认没有病原体时,沙门氏菌没有从任何样品中回收,而四个样品中的两个即使大肠杆菌计数为阴性也测试为O157:H7阳性。在室温(25至28摄氏度)下储存期间,很少有内化病原体细胞能够在番茄的中心存活。用自来水,氯或乳酸处理过的西红柿的平均表面pH分别为4.9至5.2、4.1至4.3和2.5(P <0.05),而内部pH值(3.6至3.7)没有差异。西红柿用不同的消毒剂处理过。番茄行业的常规做法是用氯化水洗涤番茄。但是,氯会被农产品中通常存在的有机物迅速降解。因此,乳酸喷雾剂可能是对番茄表面去污的更有效的替代方法。使用温热的喷雾(55摄氏度)可以减少清洗过程中病原体的内在化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号