首页> 外文期刊>Journal of food protection >Comparison of Detection Limits for Allergenic Foods between Total Adenylate (ATP+ADP+AMP) Hygiene Monitoring Test and Several Hygiene Monitoring Approaches
【24h】

Comparison of Detection Limits for Allergenic Foods between Total Adenylate (ATP+ADP+AMP) Hygiene Monitoring Test and Several Hygiene Monitoring Approaches

机译:过敏性食品对总腺苷酸(ATP + ADP + AMP)卫生监测试验与几种卫生监测方法的检测限比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Validation and verification of cleaning and inspection methods are essential to prevent the spread of allergens via cross-contact. Among the hygiene monitoring tests used on-site, the ATP test is rapid and provides quantifiable results. Nevertheless, because a wide variety of foods contain significant amount of ADP and/or AMP due to the degradation of ATP, the ATP+ADP+AMP (A3) test is preferred for detecting food debris. Hence, the A3 test may be valuable in screening food debris that may contain residual allergens. In this study, the detection limits of the A3 test for 40 foods that are regulated in several countries as allergenic were compared with those of the other hygiene monitoring tests used on-site: the conventional ATP test with similar sensitivity for ATP, the protein swab test that detects as little as 50 μg of protein, and the lateral flow immunoassay (LFI). The A3 test demonstrated lower detection limits than did the ATP test. The detection sensitivity of the A3 test was greater than that of the protein swab test except for its use on gelatin (extracted protein). The cleaning validation performance using a stainless steel model in fish and meat revealed that the A3 test is efficient in verifying the levels of remaining food debris. Although LFI displayed the best sensitivities for 10 of 14 foods, it is not commercially available for some specific allergens; however, the A3 test can detect such food debris. Moreover, the detection limits of the A3 test were preferable or comparable to those of LFI for crustacean shellfish and for processed grains, with the exception of wheat flour and buckwheat. A field study in a food processing plant demonstrated that the amount of both A3 and milk protein (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) considerably decreased as the cleaning steps progressed. Therefore, the A3 test is effective in detecting the risk for allergen cross-contact after inadequate cleaning.
机译:清洁和检测方法的验证和验证对于防止过敏原通过交叉接触的传播至关重要。在现场使用的卫生监测试验中,ATP测试迅速并提供可量化的结果。然而,由于各种食物含有大量的ADP和/或AMP由于ATP的降解,ATP + ADP + AMP(A3)测试是优选检测食物碎片。因此,A3测试在筛选可能含有残留过敏原的食物碎片中可能是有价值的。在这项研究中,与现场使用的其他卫生监测试验的其他国家调节的40种食物的A3测试的检测限是与现场使用的其他卫生监测试验中的:常规ATP试验,具有类似敏感性的ATP,蛋白质拭子检测到50μg蛋白质和侧向流动免疫测定(LFI)的测试。 A3测试证明了比ATP测试更低的检测限。 A3测试的检测灵敏度大于蛋白质拭子测试的蛋白质拭子测试,除了其在明胶(提取的蛋白质)上。使用鱼类和肉中不锈钢模型的清洁验证性能显示A3测试在验证剩余食物碎片的水平方面是有效的。虽然LFI显示了10个食物中的10个最佳敏感性,但它不适用于一些特定的过敏原;然而,A3测试可以检测这种食物碎片。此外,A3检测的检测限优于甲壳类贝类和加工晶粒的LFI的检测限,除了小麦粉和荞麦。食品加工厂的田间研究表明,随着清洁步骤的进展,A3和牛奶蛋白(酶联免疫吸附测定)的量显着降低。因此,A3测试有效地检测过敏原在清洁后过敏原的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号