首页> 外文期刊>Journal of food protection >Similar Levels of Antimicrobial Resistance in U.S. Food Service Ground Beef Products with and without a 'Raised without Antibiotics' Claim
【24h】

Similar Levels of Antimicrobial Resistance in U.S. Food Service Ground Beef Products with and without a 'Raised without Antibiotics' Claim

机译:在有和没有“无抗生素饲养”声明的情况下,美国食品服务生牛肉产品的抗药性水平相似

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

U.S. ground beef with "raised without antibiotics" (RWA) label claims are perceived as harboring fewer bacteria with antimicrobial resistance (AMR) than are found in conventional (CONV) ground beef with no such label claim. A total of 370 ground beef samples from CONV (n = 191) and RWA (n = 179) production systems were collected over 13 months from three food service suppliers. The following bacteria were cultured: Escherichia coli, tetracycline-resistant (TETr) E. coli, third-generation cephalosporin-resistant (3GC(r)) E. coli, Salmonella enterica, TETr S. enterica, 3GC(r) S. enterica, nalidixic acid-resistant S. enterica, Enterococcus spp., erythromycin-resistant Enterococcus spp., TETr Enterococcus spp., Staphylococcus aureus, and methicillin-resistant S. aureus. TETr E. coli was more frequently detected in CONV ground beef (CONV, 54.2%; RWA, 35.2%; P 0.01), but supplier (P 0.01) and production system X suppler interaction (P 0.01) effects were also significant. Metagenomic DNA was isolated from each sample, and equal amounts of metagenomic DNA were pooled by supplier, month, and production system for 75 pooled samples (38 CONV, 37 RWA). The abundance of aac(6')-Ie-aph(2 '')-Ia, aadA1, bla(CMY-2), bla(CTX-M), bla(KPC-2), erm(B), mecA, tet(A), tet(B), and tet(M) genes was assessed by quantitative PCR. The tet(A) (2.9-log(2)-fold change, P = 0.04) and tet(B) (5.6-log(2)-fold change) (P = 0.03) genes were significantly more abundant in RWA ground beef. Phylogenetic analyses revealed that ground beef microbiomes differed more by supplier than by production system. These results were consistent with prior research suggesting antimicrobial use in U.S. beef cattle has minimal impact on the AMR of bacteria found in these products. These results should spur a reevaluation of assumptions regarding the impact of antimicrobial use during U.S. beef production on the AMR of bacteria in ground beef.
机译:带有“未经抗生素饲养”(RWA)标签声明的美国碎牛肉被认为比没有标签声明的传统(CONV)碎牛肉具有更少的具有抗菌抗性(AMR)的细菌。在过去的13个月中,共从三个食品服务供应商那里收集了370份CONV(n = 191)和RWA(n = 179)生产系统中的碎牛肉样品。培养了以下细菌:大肠杆菌,四环素抗性(TETr)大肠杆菌,第三代头孢菌素抗性(3GC(r))大肠杆菌,肠炎沙门氏菌,TETr肠炎沙门氏菌,3GC(r)肠炎沙门氏菌,耐萘啶酸的肠炎链球菌,肠球菌,抗红霉素肠球菌,TETr肠球菌,金黄色葡萄球菌和耐甲氧西林的金黄色葡萄球菌。在CONV碎牛肉中更经常检测到TETr大肠杆菌(CONV,54.2%; RWA,35.2%; P <0.01),但供应商(P <0.01)和生产系统X供应商的相互作用(P <0.01)的影响也很显着。从每个样本中分离出元基因组DNA,然后按供应商,月份和生产系统对75个样本(38 CONV,37 RWA)进行等量的基因组DNA合并。 aac(6')-Ie-aph(2''-Ia,aadA1,bla(CMY-2),bla(CTX-M),bla(KPC-2),erm(B),mecA, tet(A),tet(B)和tet(M)基因通过定量PCR进行评估。 RWA碎牛肉中的tet(A)(2.9-log(2)倍变化,P = 0.04)和tet(B)(5.6-log(2)-倍变化)(P = 0.03)基因明显更丰富。系统发育分析表明,碎牛肉微生物群的差异在于供应商而不是生产系统。这些结果与先前的研究一致,表明在美国肉牛中使用抗菌剂对这些产品中发现的细菌的AMR影响最小。这些结果应促使人们重新评估关于美国牛肉生产过程中使用抗菌药物对绞牛肉中细菌AMR的影响的假设。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号