首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance >Small and medium size enterprises and the knowledge economy: Assessing the relevance of intangible asset valuation, reporting and management initiatives
【24h】

Small and medium size enterprises and the knowledge economy: Assessing the relevance of intangible asset valuation, reporting and management initiatives

机译:中小企业与知识经济:评估无形资产评估,报告和管理计划的相关性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose – The growth of the so-called “knowledge economy”, whereby the primary sources of firm value are claimed to be an increasing reliance upon the exploitation and management of intangible assets that are not reported in company balance sheets, has led to a questioning of the continued relevance of conventional financial reporting and internal management information and control systems. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the criticisms and proposed alternatives to conventional financial reporting and management control practices. As public policy makers appear to be increasingly convinced that there is an economically damaging “gap” in terms of small and medium size enterprise (SME) stakeholder understanding of intangible asset management, the paper also evaluates the arguments and evidence concerning the applicability and relevance of the problems and proposed alternatives to SMEs. Design/methodology/approach – The paper reviews the criticisms, empirical evidence and proposals to improve financial reporting and internal management control practices by incorporating information on the value of intangible assets and in developing tools for better managing these assets. Findings – The problems associated with identifying and valuing intangible assets and the fact that capitalising income (net profit) using an appropriate risk-adjusted cost-of-capital provides an adequate estimate of value, appears to make most accounting researchers highly sceptical of either the need or desirability of including intangible asset values in the balance sheet. Moreover, the suggestion that firms – particularly SMEs – could increase their value by adopting more formal and comprehensive intangible asset management systems is highly suspect and appears not to be borne out in practice. Research limitations/implications – The case study evidence in relation to the benefits to SMEs from adopting such tools – even when such tools have been specifically designed for SMEs and, along with consultancy advice, are made freely available to firms – is not encouraging and, in the view of this writer, does not provide any firm justification for significant further public involvement beyond considering including the topic in business start up course syllabuses. Originality/value – The paper provides the first review of the relevance to the SME sector of the by now extensive conceptual and empirical body of work on the valuation, reporting and management of intangible assets.
机译:目的–所谓的“知识经济”的增长,据称公司价值的主要来源是对公司资产负债表中未报告的无形资产的开发和管理的依赖性日益增加,这引起了质疑常规财务报告与内部管理信息和控制系统的持续相关性。本文的目的是评估对常规财务报告和管理控制做法的批评和建议的替代方案。随着公共决策者越来越相信中小型企业(SME)利益相关者对无形资产管理的理解在经济上具有破坏力的“鸿沟”,因此本文还评估了有关无形资产管理的适用性和相关性的论据和证据。中小企业的问题和建议的替代方案。设计/方法/方法-本文回顾了批评,经验证据和建议,以通过合并有关无形资产价值的信息以及开发更好地管理这些资产的工具来改进财务报告和内部管理控制做法。调查结果–与确定和评估无形资产有关的问题,以及使用适当的风险调整后的资本成本将收入(净利润)资本化可提供足够的价值估计这一事实,似乎使大多数会计研究人员高度怀疑这两种资产的价值。在资产负债表中包括无形资产价值的需求或可取性。此外,关于企业(尤其是中小型企业)可以通过采用更正式和更全面的无形资产管理系统来增加其价值的建议极受怀疑,并且在实践中似乎没有得到证实。研究的局限性/含意–与采用这种工具给中小型企业带来的好处有关的案例研究证据-即使此类工具是专门为中小型企业设计的,并且连同咨询建议一起免费提供给企业-并不令人鼓舞,并且,这位作者认为,除了考虑将该主题包括在商业启动课程提纲中之外,没有提供任何坚定的理由让公众进一步参与。原创性/价值–本文首次评估了无形资产的估值,报告和管理方面目前广泛的概念和实证工作与中小企业部门的相关性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号