...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Financial Markets >Liquidity cost vs. real investment efficiency
【24h】

Liquidity cost vs. real investment efficiency

机译:流动资金成本与实际投资效率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We study a model featuring endogenous information acquisition. Investment opportunities regularly depend on sources of uncertainty captured by prices. Learning from prices is crucial when investment efficiency matters. Trading profits of speculators in the secondary market lead to liquidity costs. Insider trading by the decision maker partially crowds out speculators but reduces investment efficiency. This can create a tradeoff between liquidity cost and investment efficiency that determines the information acquisition of decision makers. We find that the consideration of price discounts in the primary market incentivizes the decision maker to rely less on informational feedback from prices. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:我们研究了一种以内生信息获取为特征的模型。投资机会通常取决于价格所捕获的不确定性来源。当投资效率至关重要时,从价格中学习至关重要。投机者在二级市场上的交易利润导致流动性成本。决策者的内幕交易部分地将投机者排挤了下来,但降低了投资效率。这可以在流动性成本和投资效率之间做出权衡,从而决定决策者的信息获取。我们发现,在主要市场中考虑价格折扣可以激励决策者减少对价格信息反馈的依赖。 (C)2015 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号