...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Family Violence >Test–Retest Reliability of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2)
【24h】

Test–Retest Reliability of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2)

机译:修订后的冲突策略量表(CTS2)的重新测试可靠性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2) are widely used to measure intimate partner aggression. Various aspects of the CTS2 and its subscales have been examined, e.g. factor structure, internal consistency, and validity, but little or no evidence exists regarding the stability of the self-report of aggression on the CTS2 This study examines the stability of reports of aggression against a partner on the CTS2 among 82 men court-mandated to a batterer intervention program. At both testing times men reported on aggression occurring in the year prior to beginning treatment. Using variety scores, stability of report was strong for psychological aggression (r = 0.69), physical assault (r = 0.76), injury (r = 0.70), and negotiation (r = 0.60), but weaker for sexual coercion (r = 0.30). Implications for the use of the CTS2 in court-mandated populations are discussed.
机译:修订后的冲突策略量表(CTS2)被广泛用于衡量亲密伴侣的攻击行为。已对CTS2及其子量表的各个方面进行了检查,例如因素结构,内部一致性和有效性,但很少有或没有证据表明侵略性自我报告在CTS2上的稳定性。本研究调查了在法院授权的82名男性中,针对CTS2伴侣的侵略性报告的稳定性。殴打者干预计划。在这两个测试时间中,男性均报告在开始治疗前一年发生侵略。使用多样性评分,报告的稳定性在心理攻击(r = 0.69),人身攻击(r = 0.76),伤害(r = 0.70)和协商(r = 0.60)方面很强,但在性胁迫方面(r = 0.30)较弱)。讨论了在法院指定的人群中使用CTS2的含义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号