...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Family Violence >Automatic Encoding of Ambiguous Child Behavior in High and Low Risk for Child Physical Abuse Parents
【24h】

Automatic Encoding of Ambiguous Child Behavior in High and Low Risk for Child Physical Abuse Parents

机译:父母对儿童身体虐待的高风险和低风险中的歧义儿童行为的自动编码

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Recent theory and research suggest that physically abusive parenting behavior might be understood as originating from: 1) greater accessibility of hostileegative schema, and/or 2) lower accessibility of benign/positive schema. This study examined whether parents at high and low risk for child physical abuse (CPA) differed in the extent to which they spontaneously encoded ambiguous caregiving contexts in negative versus positive terms. Twenty-five high and forty-one low risk for CPA parents were asked to memorize a set of sentences that described ambiguous caregiving situations. After a brief delay, participants were asked to recall the sentences. During recall, cues were given (e.g., negative and positive words) to facilitate recall. According to the cued-recall paradigm, to the extent that recall was facilitated by negative/positive cues, it was inferred that negative/positive meaning was activated when the ambiguous sentences were encoded. Although all parents tended to recall more information in response to negative relative to positive cues, the influence of cue type on recall was greater for high CPA risk parents. That is, high, compared to low, CPA risk parents obtained significantly higher recall difference scores (M = 4.6 versus M = 2.3); with higher recall difference scores indicating greater recall in response to negative relative to positive cues. Present findings are consistent with the proposition that high and low CPA risk parents differ in how they spontaneously encode information in ambiguous caregiving contexts. Keywords Child physical abuse - Information processing - Encoding This research was supported, in part, by Grant #CA901490 from the Children’s Bureau, Administration of Children and Family Services, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Correspondence regarding this article should be addressed to Julie L. Crouch, Center for the Study of Family Violence and Sexual Assault, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL 60115.
机译:最近的理论和研究表明,虐待身体的父母行为可能被理解为源自:1)敌对/消极图式的可及性更高,和/或2)良性/积极图式的可比性较低。这项研究检查了在遭受儿童身体虐待(CPA)的高风险和低风险的父母中,他们自发地在模棱两可的照护环境中以消极还是积极的方式表达差异。要求CPA父母有25个高风险和41个低风险来记住一组描述模棱两可的照护情况的句子。短暂延迟后,要求参与者回忆句子。在召回期间,给出提示(例如,否定词和肯定词)以促进召回。根据提示回忆模式,在一定程度上,通过否定/阳性提示可以促进回忆,可以推断出当歧义句子被编码时,否定/阳性含义就被激活了。尽管相对于阳性提示,所有父母倾向于回忆更多的信息,但对于CPA高风险的父母,提示类型对回忆的影响更大。也就是说,高CPA风险父母与低CPA风险父母相比,召回差异得分明显更高(M = 4.6 vs M = 2.3);较高的召回率差异分数表明,相对于阳性提示,对负面反应的召回率更高。目前的发现与高和低CPA风险父母在模棱两可的照护环境中自发编码信息的方式不同的主张是一致的。关键字儿童身体虐待-信息处理-编码这项研究得到了美国卫生与公众服务部儿童局,儿童与家庭服务管理局儿童基金会的Grant#CA901490的部分支持。有关本文的通讯,应致信于伊利诺伊州北部大学家庭暴力和性侵犯研究中心朱莉·克劳奇(Julie L. Crouch),IL 60115。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号