...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Family Violence >Can Situational and Structural Factors Differentiate Between Intimate Partner and “Other” Homicide?
【24h】

Can Situational and Structural Factors Differentiate Between Intimate Partner and “Other” Homicide?

机译:在亲密伴侣和“其他”凶杀案中,情况和结构因素是否有区别?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A large body of research has identified strong and consistent correlates of aggregated intimate homicide incidents; however, the bulk of these studies focuses on the influence of either case or neighborhood characteristics on homicide types, but not both. This study examines data collected from 739 homicides in two distinct metropolitan cities to determine which factors differentiate intimate and non-intimate homicide. Findings reveal that intimate partner homicides (IPH) are more likely to involve females both as victims and offenders when compared to non-IPH incidents. In addition, IPH homicides are more likely to be committed with weapons than non-IPH, but this finding only appears in Indianapolis homicides. Indeed, one of the stark contrasts between Indianapolis and Newark was the much greater prevalence of firearms involved in IPH homicides in Indianapolis. This suggests the need for future research that sorts out patterns of household gun possession, factors influencing community levels of household gun possession, and the use of legally- or illegally-possessed firearms in IPH homicide.
机译:大量的研究已经确定了亲密的凶杀事件总有密切的相关性。然而,这些研究大部分集中在案例或邻里特征对凶杀类型的影响上,而不是两者。这项研究调查了从两个不同的大城市中从739起凶杀案收集的数据,以确定哪些因素区分了亲密和非亲密杀人案。调查结果表明,与非IPH事件相比,亲密伴侣杀人案(IPH)更有可能使女性成为受害者和犯罪者。此外,与非IPH相比,IPH凶杀更容易携带武器,但这一发现仅出现在印第安纳波利斯的凶杀中。确实,印第安纳波利斯和纽瓦克之间的鲜明对比之一是,印第安纳波利斯的IPH凶杀中使用的枪支更为广泛。这表明需要对未来的研究进行梳理,以弄清家用枪支拥有的方式,影响社区家用枪支拥有水平的因素以及在IPH凶杀案中使用合法或非法拥有的枪支。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号