首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Experimental Botany >Quantifying immunogold localization on electron microscopic thin sections: a compendium of new approaches for plant cell biologists
【24h】

Quantifying immunogold localization on electron microscopic thin sections: a compendium of new approaches for plant cell biologists

机译:量化电子显微薄片上的免疫金定位:植物细胞生物学家新方法的概述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A review is presented of recently developed methods for quantifying electron microscopical thin sections on which colloidal gold-labelled markers are used to identify and localize interesting molecules. These efficient methods rely on sound principles of random sampling, event counting, and statistical evaluation. Distributions of immunogold particles across cellular compartments can be compared within and between experimental groups. They can also be used to test for co-localization in multilabelling studies involving two or more sizes of gold particle. To test for preferential labelling of compartments, observed and expected gold particle distributions are compared by χ2 analysis. Efficient estimators of gold labelling intensity [labelling density (LD) and/or relative labelling index (RLI)] are used to analyse volume-occupying compartments (e.g. Golgi vesicles) and/or surface-occupying compartments (e.g. cell membranes). Compartment size is estimated by counting chance events after randomly superimposing test lattices of points and/or line probes. RLI=1 when there is random labelling and RLI >1 when there is preferential labelling. Between-group comparisons do not require information about compartment size but, instead, raw gold particle counts in different groups are compared by combining χ2 and contingency table analyses. These tests may also be used to assess co-distribution of different sized gold particles in compartments. Testing for co-labelling involves identifying sets of compartmental profiles that are unlabelled and labelled for one or both of two gold marker sizes. Numbers of profiles in each labelling set are compared by contingency table analysis and χ2 analysis or Fisher's exact probability test. The various methods are illustrated with worked examples based on empirical and synthetic data and will be of practical benefit to those applying single or multiple immunogold labelling in their research.
机译:综述了最近开发的用于量化电子显微薄片的方法,其中胶体金标记的标记物用于鉴定和定位感兴趣的分子。这些有效的方法依赖于随机抽样,事件计数和统计评估的合理原则。可以比较实验组内和实验组之间跨细胞区室的免疫金颗粒的分布。它们还可以用于涉及两个或更多个尺寸的金颗粒的多标记研究中的共定位测试。为了测试车厢的优先标记,通过χ 2 分析比较了观察到的和预期的金颗粒分布。金标记强度[标记密度(LD)和/或相对标记指数(RLI)]的有效估算器用于分析体积占用区室(例如高尔基囊泡)和/或表面占用区室(例如细胞膜)。在随机叠加点和/或线探针的测试格子后,通过计算偶然事件来估算隔室的大小。随机标记时RLI = 1,优先标记时RLI> 1。组间比较不需要有关间隔大小的信息,而是通过组合χ 2 和列联表分析来比较不同组中的原金颗粒计数。这些测试还可以用于评估隔室中不同大小的金颗粒的共分布。共标记测试包括识别未标记的间隔图集,并标记两个或多个金标记大小之一。通过列联表分析和χ 2 分析或Fisher精确概率检验比较每个标签集中的配置文件数量。通过基于经验和综合数据的实例说明了各种方法,这些方法将对那些在研究中应用单个或多个免疫金标记的人具有实际意义。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Experimental Botany》 |2011年第12期|p.4101-4113|共13页
  • 作者

    Terry M. Mayhew;

  • 作者单位

    To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail:;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 01:21:45

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号