首页> 外文期刊>Journal of European Public Policy >Leaders and laggards in environmental policy: a quantitative analysis of domestic policy outputs
【24h】

Leaders and laggards in environmental policy: a quantitative analysis of domestic policy outputs

机译:环境政策的领导者和落后者:国内政策产出的定量分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper investigates the domestic characteristics of 'leaders' and 'laggards' in environmental policy in 21 European countries as well as the USA, Mexico and Japan from 1970. Data with regard to environmental policy strength are related to a set of potentially explanatory domestic factors. By way of the so-called gap approach, the distance or gap between current policy in a given country and the strictest policy available in the sample at the time is established. This is done for 40 environmental policy issues in all 24 countries and at four points in time (1970, 1980, 1990 and 2000). Mean country gaps for each point in time provide a picture of changing 'leaders' and 'laggards' in environmental policy, conforming only partly to conventional wisdom. Apparently, the international reputation of environmental 'pioneers' is not always matched by equally ambitious domestic policies. Statistical analysis identifies EU membership as the most important factor explaining a strong domestic policy output, whereas environmental problem pressure, institutional structure (neo-corporatism) and the level of economic development appear to be of secondary importance.
机译:本文调查了1970年以来21个欧洲国家以及美国,墨西哥和日本在环境政策中“领导者”和“落后者”的国内特征。有关环境政策实力的数据与一系列可能具有解释性的国内因素有关。通过所谓的差距方法,可以确定给定国家当前政策与当时样本中可用的最严格政策之间的距离或差距。在所有24个国家中的四个时间点(1970年,1980年,1990年和2000年)针对40个环境政策问题进行了此项工作。每个时间点的平均国家差距提供了环境政策中“领导者”和“落后者”变化的图片,仅部分符合传统观念。显然,环境“先驱者”的国际声誉并不总是与同样雄心勃勃的国内政策相匹配。统计分析表明,欧盟成员国是解释强大的国内政策产出的最重要因素,而环境问题压力,体制结构(新法人主义)和经济发展水平似乎是次要的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号