首页> 外文期刊>Journal of European Public Policy >Democracy without democracy? Can the EU's democratic ‘outputs’ be separated from the democratic ‘inputs’ provided by competitive parties and majority rule?
【24h】

Democracy without democracy? Can the EU's democratic ‘outputs’ be separated from the democratic ‘inputs’ provided by competitive parties and majority rule?

机译:没有民主的民主?欧盟的民主“产出”是否可以与竞争政党和多数统治提供的民主“投入”区分开?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Various European Union (EU) analysts suggest that although a democratic deficit exists from the perspective of ‘input’ democracy, democratic processes such as competitive parties and majority rule are neither necessary nor suitable to secure democratic ‘outputs’ of the kind the EU delivers. This article disputes this claim. ‘Input’ arguments are vital to the legitimacy of decision-making in the EU's policy areas, and the non- and counter-majoritarian mechanisms these analysts advocate have perverse rather than beneficial effects on the quality of ‘outputs’.View full textDownload full textKeywordsDemocratic deficit, ‘input’ and ‘output’ democracy, majority ruleRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13501760903465256
机译:各种欧盟分析人士认为,尽管从“投入”民主的角度来看存在民主赤字,但竞争性政党和多数派统治等民主进程既无必要,也不适合确保民主的“产出”。欧盟提供的那种。本文对此主张提出异议。 “投入”论点对于欧盟政策领域决策的合法性至关重要,而这些分析家所倡导的非君主制和反专制机制对“产出”的质量产生了有害而非有益的影响。查看全文下载全文关键字民主赤字,“投入”和“产出”民主,多数统治相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“类似公民,网络犯罪,微博,微博,technorati,美味,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13501760903465256

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号