首页> 外文期刊>Journal of European Integration >The Clarity of Policy Alternatives, Left-Right and the European Parliament Vote in 2004
【24h】

The Clarity of Policy Alternatives, Left-Right and the European Parliament Vote in 2004

机译:明确的政策选择,左派和2004年欧洲议会投票

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The importance of the left-right divide for party choice is well established, both for legislative and European Parliament (EP) elections. However, the conditions under which left-right self-placement becomes more or less important in explaining the vote in both legislative and EP elections are clearly understudied. The article uses the 2004 EP elections as a laboratory to understand if there are indeed systematic differences between political systems' characteristics that might explain variation in terms of the strength of the relationship between left-right self-placement and the vote. Using the survey data from the European Election Study 2004 (twenty-one EU member states), the paper has two goals. First, to examine whether citizens' left-right self-placement has a different impact on the vote in different types of democratic regime, defined in terms of the contrast between consolidating and long-established democracies. Secondly, to examine whether this contrast resists the introduction of controls for three other factors hypothesized to make a difference in the extent to which left-right orientations have a greater influence on the vote: the permissiveness of electoral system; the clarity of policy alternatives provided by the party system; and the particular type of party alignments along both the left-right and anti-/pro-integration scales that tend to characterize each country. Our findings corroborate that (the 2004 EP) elections do seem to be about choosing parties in terms of left-right orientations to a considerable extent. Furthermore, we found that the usefulness of left-right orientations as cues to the vote seems to be contingent upon a major contextual factor: greater levels of clarity of the policy alternatives provided by the party system render citizens' left-right self-placement more consequential for their EP vote. Finally, we found that left-right orientations may not be equally useful in consolidating and in the remaining established democracies.
机译:在立法选举和欧洲议会选举中,左右分离对于政党选择的重要性已得到充分确立。但是,清楚地研究了在立法和欧洲议会选举中,左右自我安置在解释投票中或多或少变得重要的条件。本文使用2004年EP选举作为实验室,以了解政治制度特征之间是否确实存在系统性差异,从而可以解释左右自我安置与投票之间关系的强度方面的差异。利用2004年欧洲选举研究(21个欧盟成员国)的调查数据,本文有两个目标。首先,研究在巩固和长期建立的民主国家之间的对比方面,在不同类型的民主制度中,公民的左右自选权是否会对投票产生不同的影响。其次,研究这种对比是否抵制了其他三个因素的控制,这些因素被认为在左右方向对投票产生更大影响的程度上有所不同:选举制度的允许性;政党制度提供的政策选择的清晰性;以及沿左右和反/亲一体化尺度的政党结盟的特定类型,这往往是每个国家的特征。我们的发现证实了(2004 EP)选举的确在很大程度上是关于左右方向选择政党的。此外,我们发现左右方向作为投票线索的有用性似乎取决于一个主要的背景因素:政党系统提供的政策选择的更高层次的清晰性使得公民的左右自我定位更加重要。其EP投票的结果。最后,我们发现左右方向在巩固和建立现有的民主国家中可能没有同等的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号