首页> 外文期刊>Journal of European Competition Law & Practice >Ceeskee draehy, a.s.v European Commission: No Obligation for the Commission to Assess Exculpatory Evidence If There Is Already Sufficient Incriminating Evidence to Order an Inspection
【24h】

Ceeskee draehy, a.s.v European Commission: No Obligation for the Commission to Assess Exculpatory Evidence If There Is Already Sufficient Incriminating Evidence to Order an Inspection

机译:Ceesskee Draehy,A.Ve欧盟委员会:如果已经有足够的有罪证据来命令检查,委员会没有义务评估潜在证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Ceeskee draehy is the Czech state-owned railway operator, active in markets for (ⅰ) the supply of passenger transport services and (ⅱ) the provision of railway infrastructure management in the Czech Republic. In January 2012, the Czech Competition Office opened an investigation into Ceeskee draehy due to suspicions of predatory pricing on the Prague-Ostrava train line. The Czech Competition Office shared the information it obtained with the European Commission and, on 18 April 2016, the Commission adopted a decision (C(2016) 2417) ordering Ceske' drahy to submit to an unannounced inspection (Case AT.40156 Falcon) under Article 20(4) of Regulation 1/2003. On 22 June 2016, the Commission adopted a separate decision (C(2016) 3993) ordering Ceeskee draehy to admit to a second unannounced inspection (Case AT.40401 Twins) based on evidence the Commission obtained during the Falcon dawn raid.
机译:Ceeskee Draehy是捷克国有铁路运营商,积极参与(Ⅰ)乘客运输服务供应及(Ⅱ)在捷克共和国提供铁路基础设施管理。 2012年1月,由于怀疑布拉格 - 奥拉瓦列车线上的掠夺性定价,捷克比赛办公室对Ceeskee Draehy进行了调查。捷克比赛办公室分享了与欧盟委员会获得的信息,并于2016年4月18日,委员会通过了一个决定(C(2016)2417)命令Ceske'Drahy提交未经宣布的检查(案例在40156猎鹰)下第20(4)条第1/2003号法规。委员会于2016年6月22日通过了一项单独的决定(C(2016)3993)根据委员会在Falcon Dawn Raid期间获得的证据,将Ceeskee Draehy达成第二次未经宣布的检验(案例为40401双胞胎)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号