...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of European Competition Law & Practice >Futbol Club Barcelona v Commission: Foul Play—if in Doubt, the Commission to Question the Evidence Submitted by the Parties
【24h】

Futbol Club Barcelona v Commission: Foul Play—if in Doubt, the Commission to Question the Evidence Submitted by the Parties

机译:巴塞隆纳足球俱乐部诉委员会:犯规行为—如有疑问,质疑双方提交的证据的委员会

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The General Court rules that the Commission should investigate beyond the evidence submitted by the parties if it is in possession of documents calling that evidence into question. On 26 February 2019, the General Court in Case T-865/16 Futbol Club Barcelona v Commission annulled the European Commissions ('Commission) decision declaring that preferential corporate tax rate in favour of Real Madrid, FC Barcelona, Athletic Bilbao, and Atletico Osasuna constitute unlawful and incompatible State aid. In its decision, the Commission ordered Spain to determine the exact amount of aid to be recovered. In the guidance provided to the Spanish authority, the Commission recalled that State aid in this case consisted of the amount of corporate tax which the clubs paid as non-profit legal entities and the amount of tax which would have been due if the four clubs were subject to the rules of the corporate taxation of limited companies (Case COMP/SA.29769—Aid to certain Spanish football clubs).
机译:普通法院裁定,如果委员会拥有使该证据有疑问的文件,则委员会应在当事方提供的证据之外进行调查。 2019年2月26日,普通法院在T-865 / 16巴塞罗那巴塞罗那足球俱乐部诉欧洲委员会案中废除了欧洲委员会(``委员会'')的决定,宣布有利于皇家马德里,巴塞罗那足球俱乐部,毕尔巴鄂竞技队和奥萨苏尼竞技的公司优惠税率构成非法和不相容的国家援助。委员会在决定中命令西班牙确定要追回的确切援助数额。在向西班牙当局提供的指导中,委员会忆及,在这种情况下,国家援助包括各俱乐部作为非营利性法人实体支付的公司税额,以及如果这四个俱乐部分别为应缴纳的税额。遵守有限责任公司的公司税规定(案例COMP / SA.29769-援助某些西班牙足球俱乐部)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号