首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies >Hybrid Border-Crossers? Towards a Radical Socialisation of 'Mixed Race'
【24h】

Hybrid Border-Crossers? Towards a Radical Socialisation of 'Mixed Race'

机译:混合跨境?迈向“混合种族”的激进社会化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The celebration of 'mixed race' as the model 'transgressive' (post-)identity obfuscates the ambivalence at the root of this construct. Far from 'abolishing' race or throwing it into crisis, 'mixed-race' bodies and minds continue to be evaluated as disparate, unwholesome and non-belonging, and appear to invite dissective reading practices such as stares, intrusive questions and comments which are commonly treated as a 'normal reaction to abnormal bodies'. In this article I examine semi-structured interviews with 22 people of Thai and non-Thai parentage in Britain and Germany. Drawing on Fanon's existential phenomenology, I theorise interviewees' everyday confrontations with intrusive reading practices of their bodies, origins, loyalties and families. The persistence of pathologising discourses and practices on 'mixed race' renders celebratory notions of 'hybrid border-crossers' problematic. Rather than a pre-social property of particular bodies which trigger intrusive labelling attempts, 'ambiguous phenotype' is socially produced in biologistic race discourses and violent reading practices. 'Mixed race' should be more aptly theorised as a dissective racialising technology which mobilises essentialised forms of knowledge and entitles some to gaze at and define others. It is constituted in power relations which are socially produced and, hence, also open to contestation and change.
机译:将“混合种族”作为“侵入性”(后)身份模型的庆祝活动掩盖了这种构造的根源。除了“废除”种族或使其陷入危机之外,“混血”的身心仍然被认为是完全不同,不健康和不属人的,并且似乎引起了诸如眼神,侵入性问题和评论之类的解剖性阅读实践。通常被视为“对异常物体的正常反应”。在本文中,我研究了在英国和德国对22位泰国人和非泰国人为父母的人进行的半结构式访谈。我以法农的生存现象学为基础,根据受访者的身体,血统,忠诚度和家庭的侵入性阅读实践,对受访者的日常对抗进行了理论分析。关于“混合种族”的病理学论述和实践的持续存在,使“混合型越境者”的庆祝概念成为问题。 “歧义表型”不是在特定的身体之前具有触发侵入性标签尝试的社会属性,而是在生物学的种族言论和暴力阅读实践中在社会上产生的。 “混合种族”应该更恰当地理论化为一种解剖种族化技术,该技术可以动员本质化的知识形式,并赋予某些人凝视和定义其他人的知识的权利。它由社会上产生的权力关系所构成,因此也容易引起竞争和变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号