首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies >Towards Transnational Studies: World Theories, Transnationalisation and Changing Institutions
【24h】

Towards Transnational Studies: World Theories, Transnationalisation and Changing Institutions

机译:走向跨国研究:世界理论,跨国化和制度变迁

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A transnational studies perspective should be able to deal with both new social formations sui generis, such as transnational social spaces, and how ‘old’ national, international and local institutions acquire ‘new’ meanings and functions in the process of cross-border transactions. There is now a voluminous literature dealing with the emergence and above all the forms of transnational activities of migrants and the attendant consequences for the social integration of immigrants. If transnational ties and formations are consequential for social change and perhaps even social transformation, we also need to find indications about changing institutions in the national, international and local realms of transnational spaces. From this perspective we need not only to look at various transnational ties and formations across the borders of national states, but also at the repercussions for national and local institutions. In order to address this problem, the paper argues that both the concept of transnationalisation—including transnational social spaces—and world approaches, such as world systems and world polity theories, could be useful lenses to describe different aspects of transnational processes and boundaries. Second, transnational studies needs to engage both world theories and a transnational optic to ask about the social mechanisms by which transnational processes affect institutional change: path-dependency on a systemic or macro level, social closure, opportunity hoarding and brokerage on a collective or meso level, and symbolic recognition on a cognitive or micro level.View full textDownload full textKeywordsTransnationalisation, World Systems, Institutional Change, Boundaries, Social Mechanisms, Dual CitizenshipRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2010.489365
机译:跨国研究的观点应该能够应对特殊的新的社会形态,例如跨国社会空间,以及“旧的”国家,国际和地方机构在此过程中如何获得“新的”意义和功能。跨境交易。现在有大量的文献涉及移民的跨国活动的出现,尤其是跨国活动的形式以及对移民社会融合的伴随后果。如果跨国联系和形成对社会变革乃至社会转型具有重要意义,那么我们还需要找到关于改变跨国空间的国家,国际和地方领域的制度的迹象。从这个角度来看,我们不仅需要研究跨越民族国家边界的各种跨国联系和形式,而且还需要研究对国家和地方机构的影响。为了解决这个问题,本文认为,跨国化的概念(包括跨国社会空间)和世界方法,例如世界体系和世界政治理论,都可能是描述跨国过程和边界不同方面的有用镜头。 。其次,跨国研究需要同时运用世界理论和跨国视角来询问跨国过程影响制度变革的社会机制:系统或宏观层面的路径依赖,社会封闭,机会ho积和集体或中观中介级别,以及在认知或微观级别上的符号识别。查看全文,twitter,technorati,可口,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2010.489365

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号