首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health >A framework for measuring health inequity
【24h】

A framework for measuring health inequity

机译:衡量健康不平等的框架

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background: Health inequality has long attracted keen attention in the research and policy arena. While there may be various motivations to study health inequality, what distinguishes it as a topic is moral concern. Despite the importance of this moral interest, a theoretical and analytical framework for measuring health inequality acknowledging moral concerns remains to be established. Study objective: To propose a framework for measuring the moral or ethical dimension of health inequality—that is, health inequity. Design: Conceptual discussion. Conclusions: Measuring health inequity entails three steps: (1) defining when a health distribution becomes inequitable, (2) deciding on measurement strategies to operationalise a chosen concept of equity, and (3) quantifying health inequity information. For step (1) a variety of perspectives on health equity exist under two categories, health equity as equality in health, and health inequality as an indicator of general injustice in society. In step (2), when we are interested in health inequity, the choice of the measurement of health, the unit of time, and the unit of analysis in health inequity analysis should reflect moral considerations. In step (3) we must follow principles rather than convenience and consider six questions that arise when quantifying health inequity information. This proposed framework suggests various ways to conceptualise the moral dimension of health inequality and emphasises the logical consistency from conception to measurement.
机译:背景:健康不平等问题长期以来在研究和政策领域引起了广泛关注。尽管研究健康不平等的动机可能多种多样,但将其作为主题加以区分的是道德关注。尽管这种道德利益很重要,但仍需建立一种用于衡量承认道德问题的健康不平等的理论和分析框架。研究目标:提出一个衡量健康不平等的道德或伦理维度(即健康不平等)的框架。设计:概念讨论。结论:衡量健康不平等包括三个步骤:(1)定义何时健康分配变得不公平;(2)确定衡量策略以实施选定的公平概念;(3)量化健康不平等信息。对于步骤(1),存在两种关于健康公平的观点,即健康公平是健康中的平等,而健康不平等是社会中普遍不公正的指标。在步骤(2)中,当我们对健康不平等感兴趣时,健康度量的选择,时间单位以及健康不平等分析中的分析单位应反映道德考虑。在步骤(3)中,我们必须遵循原则而不是便利,并考虑量化健康不平等信息时出现的六个问题。这个提议的框架提出了各种方法来概念化健康不平等的道德层面,并强调了从概念到测量的逻辑一致性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号