首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health >Reviewing Evidence On Complex Social Interventions: Appraising Implementation In Systematic Reviews Of The Health Effects Of Organisational-level Workplace Interventions
【24h】

Reviewing Evidence On Complex Social Interventions: Appraising Implementation In Systematic Reviews Of The Health Effects Of Organisational-level Workplace Interventions

机译:审查有关复杂社会干预的证据:评估组织级别工作场所干预对健康的影响的系统评价中的实施情况

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background: The reporting of intervention implementation in studies included in systematic reviews of organisational-level workplace interventions was appraised. Implementation is taken to include such factors as intervention setting, resources, planning, collaborations, delivery and macro-level socioeconomic contexts. Understanding how implementation affects intervention outcomes may help prevent erroneous conclusions and misleading assumptions about generalisability, but implementation must be adequately reported if it is to be taken into account. Methods: Data on implementation were obtained from four systematic reviews of complex interventions in workplace settings. Implementation was appraised using a specially developed checklist and by means of an unstructured reading of the text. Results: 103 studies were identified and appraised, evaluating four types of organisational-level workplace intervention (employee participation, changing job tasks, shift changes and compressed working weeks). Many studies referred to implementation, but reporting was generally poor and anecdotal in form. This poor quality of reporting did not vary greatly by type or date of publication. A minority of studies described how implementation may have influenced outcomes. These descriptions were more usefully explored through an unstructured reading of the text, rather than by means of the checklist. Conclusions: Evaluations of complex interventions should include more detailed reporting of implementation and consider how to measure quality of implementation. The checklist helped us explore the poor reporting of implementation in a more systematic fashion. In terms of interpreting study findings and their transferability, however, the more qualitative appraisals appeared to offer greater potential for exploring how implementation may influence the findings of specific evaluations. Implementation appraisal techniques for systematic reviews of complex interventions require further development and testing.
机译:背景:评估了在组织级工作场所干预的系统评价中包括的研究中干预措施的实施报告。采取的措施包括干预因素,资源,计划,合作,交付和宏观社会经济背景等因素。了解实施方式如何影响干预结果可能有助于防止关于可推广性的错误结论和误导性假设,但是如果要考虑实施情况,则必须充分报告实施情况。方法:实施数据来自对工作场所环境中的复杂干预措施的四个系统评价。使用专门开发的清单并通过对文本的非结构化阅读来评估实施情况。结果:鉴定和评估了103项研究,评估了四种类型的组织级工作场所干预(员工参与,工作任务变更,轮班变更和工作时间压缩)。许多研究都提到实施,但是报告通常很差,而且形式还很有趣。报告质量差,出版类型或出版日期变化不大。少数研究描述了实施可能如何影响结果。通过非结构化阅读文本,而不是通过清单,可以更有效地探索这些描述。结论:对复杂干预措施的评估应包括更详细的实施报告,并考虑如何衡量实施质量。该清单帮助我们以更系统的方式探索了糟糕的实施报告。然而,在解释研究结果及其可移植性方面,更具定性的评估似乎为探索实施方式如何影响特定评估结果提供了更大的潜力。系统评估复杂干预措施的实施评估技术需要进一步的开发和测试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号