首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health >Does childcare influence socioeconomic inequalities in unintentional injury? Findings from the UK Millennium Cohort Study
【24h】

Does childcare influence socioeconomic inequalities in unintentional injury? Findings from the UK Millennium Cohort Study

机译:育儿会影响意外伤害中的社会经济不平等吗?英国千年队列研究的发现

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background In recent decades the proportion of infants and young children being cared for in childcare has increased. Little is known about the impact that non-parental care has on childhood unintentional injury and whether this varies by socioeconomic group. Methods Using data from a contemporary UK cohort of children at age 9 months (N = 18114) and 3 years (N = 13 718), Poisson regression was used to explore the association between childcare type (parental, informal, formal) and the risk of unintentional injury, overall and by socioeconomic group. Results At age 9 months there was no overall association between childcare and injury. However, when stratifying the analyses, infants from higher socioeconomic groups were less likely to be injured if they were cared for in formal childcare (compared with being cared for only by a parent), whereas those from lower social groups were more likely to be injured. At age 3 years informal childcare was associated with an increased risk of injury overall; in the stratified analyses this increased risk occurred only in less affluent groups. Formal childcare was no longer associated with injury at age 3 in any strata.rnConclusions Previous findings have shown that childcare can have a positive influence on childhood injury; however, a recent Unicef report highlighted that a lack of access to high-quality childcare could lead to a widening of inequalities. Our analyses indicate that childcare does have the potential to widen inequalities in injury; further research is required to understand why childcare has a differential impact on unintentional injury and how this might be prevented.
机译:背景技术在最近的几十年中,在儿童保育中被照顾的婴幼儿的比例增加了。对于非父母照料对儿童意外伤害的影响以及是否因社会经济群体而异,人们所知甚少。方法使用来自当代英国9个月(N = 18114)和3岁(N = 13 718)儿童队列的数据,使用Poisson回归探讨托儿类型(父母,非正式,正式)与风险之间的关联总体和社会经济群体的意外伤害结果在9个月大时,儿童保育与伤害之间没有整体关联。但是,在对分析进行分层时,来自较高社会经济地位群体的婴儿如果受到正式托儿服务的照料(与仅由父母照料的照料相比)受伤害的可能性较小,而来自较低社会群体的婴儿受伤害的可能性更高。 。在3岁时,非正式育儿与整体受伤风险增加有关;在分层分析中,这种增加的风险仅发生在富裕人群中。正式的托儿服务已不再与任何年龄段的3岁时的伤害有关。rn结论先前的发现表明,托儿服务可以对儿童期的伤害产生积极的影响。但是,联合国儿童基金会最近的一份报告强调指出,缺乏获得高质量儿童保育的机会可能导致不平等现象扩大。我们的分析表明,托儿服务确实有可能扩大伤害不平等的可能性。需要进行进一步的研究,以了解为什么育儿对意外伤害有不同的影响,以及如何预防意外伤害。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health》 |2010年第2期|161-166|共6页
  • 作者单位

    Centre for Paediatric Epidemiology and Biostatistics, UCL Institute of Child Health, London, UK UCL Institute of Child Health, 30 Guilford Street,London WC1N 1EH, UK;

    Centre for Paediatric Epidemiology and Biostatistics, UCL Institute of Child Health, London, UK;

    York and Humber Public Health Observatory, York, UK;

    York and Humber Public Health Observatory, York, UK;

    Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK;

    Centre for Paediatric Epidemiology and Biostatistics, UCL Institute of Child Health, London, UK;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号