首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Science and Health. A, Toxic/Hazardous Substances & Environmental Engineering >Comparing Primary Energy Attributed to Renewable Energy with Primary Energy Equivalent to Determine Carbon Abatement in a National Context
【24h】

Comparing Primary Energy Attributed to Renewable Energy with Primary Energy Equivalent to Determine Carbon Abatement in a National Context

机译:在国家范围内将可再生能源的一次能源与等效的一次能源进行比较以确定碳减排

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The current conventional approach to determining the primary energy associated with non-combustible renewable energy (RE) sources such as wind energy and hydro power is to equate the electricity generated from these sources with the primary energy supply. This paper compares this with an approach that was formerly used by the IEA, in which the primary energy equivalent attributed to renewable energy was equated with the fossil fuel energy it displaces. Difficulties with implementing this approach in a meaningful way for international comparisons lead to most international organisations abandoning the primary energy equivalent methodology. It has recently re-emerged in prominence however, as efforts grow to develop baseline procedures for quantifying the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions avoided by renewable energy within the context of the Kyoto Protocol credit trading mechanisms. This paper discusses the primary energy equivalent approach and in particular the distinctions between displacing fossil fuel energy in existing plant or in new plant. The approach is then extended provide insight into future primary energy displacement by renewable energy and to quantify the amount of CO_2 emissions avoided by renewable energy. The usefulness of this approach in quantifying the benefits of renewable energy is also discussed in an energy policy context, with regard to increasing security of energy supply as well as reducing energy-related GHG (and other) emissions. The approach is applied in a national context and Ireland is case study country selected for this research. The choice of Ireland is interesting in two respects. The first relates to the high proportion of electricity only fossil fuel plants in Ireland resulting in a significant variation between primary energy and primary energy equivalent. The second concerns Ireland's poor performance to date in limiting GHG emissions in line with its Kyoto target and points to the need for techniques to quantify the potential contribution of renewable energy in achieving the target set.
机译:确定与不可燃可再生能源(RE)相关的一次能源(例如风能和水力发电)的当前常规方法是将这些能源所产生的电力等同于一次能源。本文将这种方法与国际能源署以前使用的方法进行了比较,在该方法中,可再生能源的主要能源当量等于其替代的化石燃料能源。在以有意义的方式进行国际比较时难以实施这种方法导致大多数国际组织放弃了主要能源当量方法。然而,随着在《京都议定书》信贷交易机制范围内努力制定基准程序来量化可再生能源避免的温室气体(GHG)排放量的努力,该方法最近再次崭露头角。本文讨论了主要能源当量方法,特别是在现有工厂或新工厂中替代化石燃料能源之间的区别。然后扩展该方法,以提供有关可再生能源未来一次能源替代的见解,并量化可再生能源避免的CO_2排放量。在提高能源供应安全性以及减少与能源有关的GHG(和其他)排放量的能源政策方面,还讨论了这种方法在量化可再生能源收益方面的有用性。该方法在国家范围内适用,爱尔兰是本研究选择的案例研究国家。爱尔兰的选择在两个方面都很有趣。第一个问题涉及爱尔兰的仅电力化石燃料工厂占很高的比例,这导致一次能源和一次能源当量之间的巨大差异。第二个问题涉及爱尔兰迄今为止在实现其《京都议定书》目标方面限制温室气体排放方面的不良表现,并指出需要采用技术来量化可再生能源对实现目标的潜在贡献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号