...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Radioactivity >Comparison of radon doses based on different radon monitoring approaches
【24h】

Comparison of radon doses based on different radon monitoring approaches

机译:基于不同ra监测方法的ra剂量比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In 43 places (23 schools, 3 kindergartens, 16 offices and one dwelling), indoor radon has been monitored as an intercomparison experiment, using alpha-scintillation cells (SC - Joief Stefan Institute, Slovenia), various kinds of solid state nuclear track detectors (KIK - Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany; UFO - National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba, Japan; RET - University College Dublin, Ireland) and active electronic devices (EQF, Sarad, Germany). At the same place, the radon levels and, consequently, the effective doses obtained with different radon devices differed substantially (by a factor of 2 or more), and no regularity was observed as regards which detector would show a higher or lower dose. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:在43个地方(23所学校,3所幼儿园,16个办公室和1所住宅)中,使用α闪烁电池(SC-乔伊夫·斯蒂芬研究所,斯洛文尼亚),各种固态核径迹探测器对室内ra进行了比较实验(KIK-德国卡尔斯鲁厄技术学院; UFO-日本国家放射科学研究院,日本千叶; RET-爱尔兰都柏林大学学院)和有源电子设备(EQF,德国Sarad)。在同一地方,the水平以及因此用不同ra设备获得的有效剂量有很大差异(相差2倍或更多),并且对于哪个检测器显示更高或更低的剂量没有观察到规律性。 (C)2016 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号