...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Management >Drought vulnerability and risk assessment in India: Sensitivity analysis and comparison of aggregation techniques
【24h】

Drought vulnerability and risk assessment in India: Sensitivity analysis and comparison of aggregation techniques

机译:印度的干旱脆弱性和风险评估:敏感性分析与聚集技术比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Long term drought management requires proper assessment and characterization of drought hazard, vulnerability and risk. This is particularly important for an agriculture-dependent, highly-populated, developing country such as India. However, the regulation of drought vulnerability and drought risk assessment in the country is mostly region-specific and ad-hoc, considering only a limited number of vulnerability indicators. In this study, a comprehensive, fine-resolution, country-wide drought risk assessment is carried out considering drought hazard in a multivariate framework, and using reliable drought vulnerability indicators that account for exposure, sensitivity and adaptive capacity. Further, multiple aggregation techniques including subjective, objective and comprehensive methods are employed for vulnerability assessment, and their performance assessed and compared. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)+Entropy and TOPSIS methods, which are comprehensive aggregation techniques are found to be better performing, TOPSIS being the most robust method. A bivariate choropleth map based on the TOPSIS-derived drought vulnerability shows regions of Punjab, Haryana, Uttar Pradesh and Tamil Nadu subjected to drought hazard-driven risk, while risk in other regions such as Rajasthan, parts of Central India, Orissa and parts of Maharashtra are driven more by drought vulnerability. Parts of Western Rajasthan, Vidharbha, North-East India, Chattisgarh, Tamil Nadu and Karnataka are under severe drought risk resulting from an interplay of hazard and vulnerability. Irrigation index, water body fraction, and groundwater availability are found to be the most significant indicators for assessing drought vulnerability in India. The above findings can aid decision makers and government bodies to plan region-specific line of action for building drought resilience.
机译:长期干旱管理需要适当的评估和对干旱危害,脆弱性和风险的表征。这对于农业依赖的,高度填充的发展中国家特别重要,例如印度。但是,该国干旱脆弱性和干旱风险评估的规定大多是特定于地区和临时的,考虑有限数量的漏洞指标。在这项研究中,在多元框架中考虑干旱危险,并使用可靠的干旱漏洞指标,进行全面,精细的国家宽的干旱风险评估,占暴露,灵敏度和自适应能力的可靠性干旱漏洞指标。此外,用于漏洞评估的多种聚合技术,包括主观,客观和综合方法,以及评估和比较其性能。发现分析层次处理(AHP)+熵和TOPSIS方法,它们是综合聚合技术更好的表现,TOPSIS是最强大的方法。基于Topsis衍生的干旱脆弱性的一只生物核苷酸杂志地图显示了旁遮普邦,哈里亚纳邦,北方邦和泰米尔纳德的地区受到干旱危险驱动的风险,而Rajasthan,印度中部地区的其他地区的风险,奥里萨斯及其部分地区Maharashtra通过干旱脆弱性驾驶更多。西拉贾斯坦邦的部分地区,Vidharbha,印度,Chattisgarh,Tamil Nadu和Karnataka受到危险和脆弱性相互作用的严重干旱风险。灌溉指数,水体分数和地下水可用性被认为是评估印度干旱脆弱性最重要的指标。上述调查结果可以帮助决策者和政府机构计划建立干旱恢复力的地区特定行动行动。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Environmental Management 》 |2021年第1期| 113689.1-113689.10| 共10页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Bombay Powai Mumbai 400076 India;

    Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Bombay Powai Mumbai 400076 India Interdisciplinary Program in Climate Studies Indian Institute of Technology Bombay Powai Mumbai 400076 India;

    Department of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Bombay Powai Mumbai 400076 India;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Drought risk; Vulnerability; Multivariate drought index; AHP; TOPSIS; Choropleth;

    机译:干旱风险;脆弱性;多变量干旱指数;AHP;topsis;芝麻蛋白;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号