首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Management >Biotic indices of hydrological variability as tools to inform dynamic ecological status assessments in river ecosystems
【24h】

Biotic indices of hydrological variability as tools to inform dynamic ecological status assessments in river ecosystems

机译:生物学的水文变宽作为工具,以告知河流生态系统的动态生态状态评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

River biomonitoring uses biotic indices that assess human-induced degradation, including pollution, by comparison with type-specific static biological reference conditions. However, index scores that indicate pollution may reflect biological responses to natural hydrological variability associated with low flows and drying, leading biomonitoring schemes to misclassify sites as degraded. To address this, dynamic, site-specific adjustments of static biological reference conditions have been proposed, but current biomonitoring tools cannot facilitate implementation of these adjustments. We analyzed 329 samples from mediterranean-climate rivers in Greece, to evaluate the use of six stressor-specific macroinvertebrate-based indices of hydrological variability (CEFI, DEHLI, ELF, LIFE, LIFENZ, MIS-index) as tools to facilitate dynamic adjustments of static biological reference conditions. We examined macroinvertebrate assemblage responses to physicochemical and land use drivers in relation to each sample's hydrological conditions, as assessed by the six indices. We evaluated index performance beyond the region of development by exploring correlations among indices, including correlations with the region-specific Greek ELF index, for which 100% of taxa were represented. We also examined the influence of inorganic nutrient pollution on index performance by comparing index scores from samples with and without nutrient pollution. Season, water temperature, agricultural land use and nutrient pollution were major drivers of macroinvertebrate assemblage composition. Indices were positively correlated but correlation strength varied considerably, driven primarily by taxonomic representation (the proportion of sampled taxa included in each index's calculation), and potentially also by differences in river types, taxonomic resolution and sampling strategies. All indices identified site-specific hydrological conditions both in the presence and absence of nutrient pollution. We recommend the development of region-specific biotic indices of hydrological variability, or regional adaptation of existing indices, to represent 100% of the regional taxa pool and thus to enable acceptable performance beyond their region of development. Such indices could inform dynamic adaptation of static biological reference conditions by assessing site-specific hydrological conditions based on a macroinvertebrate assemblage, without the collection of additional, abiotic field data. Application of our proposed approach could prevent misclassification of ecological status, thus avoiding time-demanding and costly mismanagement of rivers and streams.
机译:河流生物监测使用与特定于特异性静态生物参考条件相比,评估人类诱导的降解,包括污染的生物指数。然而,表明污染的指数评分可能反映与低流量和干燥相关的天然水文变异性的生物反应,导致生物监测方案以将位点分类为降解的位点。为了解决这个问题,已经提出了动态,现场特定的静态生物参考条件调整,但目前的生物监测工具不能促进实施这些调整。我们分析了来自希腊地中海气候河流的329个样本,以评估使用六种压力源特异性的大型大型门诊物质的水文变异性(CEFI,Dehli,ELF,Life,Lifenz,Mis-Index)作为工具,以便于动态调整静态生物参考条件。我们检查了与每个样本的水文条件相关的Macroinvertebrets组装对物理化学和土地利用司机,如六个指数评估的那样。通过探索指数之间的相关性,包括索引的相关性,包括与特定于地区的希腊精灵指数的相关性,为其评估了索引的索引性能,其中100%的分类群。我们还通过比较来自营养污染的样品的指数评分,研究了无机养分污染对指标性能的影响。季节,水温,农业用地使用和营养污染是大型脊椎门组合组成的主要驱动因素。指数是正相关的,但相关强度主要变化,主要由分类学代表(每个指数计算中包含的采样分类群的比例),并且可能也通过河流类型,分类决议和抽样策略的差异。所有索引在存在和没有营养污染的情况下鉴定了特异性特异性水文病症。我们建议开展地区的水文变异性或区域适应现有指数的特定生物指标,以代表100%的区域出区池,从而能够超出其发展地区的可接受的表现。这种指标可以通过评估基于大型椎晶晶组合的现场特异性水文条件来提供静态生物参考条件的动态调整,而不会收集额外的非生物场数据。我们所提出的方法的应用可以防止错误分类生态地位,从而避免了河流和溪流的时间苛刻和昂贵的管理不变。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号