...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Management >Predictive modeling of swell-strength of expansive soils using artificial intelligence approaches: ANN, ANFIS and GEP
【24h】

Predictive modeling of swell-strength of expansive soils using artificial intelligence approaches: ANN, ANFIS and GEP

机译:人工智能方法的膨胀土膨胀强度的预测建模:安,ANFIS和GEP

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This study presents the development of new empirical prediction models to evaluate swell pressure and un-confined compression strength of expansive soils (P_sUCS-ES) using three soft computing methods, namely artificial neural networks (ANNs), adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), and gene expression programming (GEP). An extensive database comprising 168 P_s and 145 UCS records was established after a comprehensive literature search. The nine most influential and easily determined geotechnical parameters were taken as the predictor variables. The network was trained and tested, and the predictions of the proposed models were compared with the observed results. The performance of all the models was tested using mean absolute error (MAE), root squared error (RSE), root mean square error (RMSE), Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), correlation coefficient (R), regression coefficient (R~2) and relative root mean square error (RRMSE). The sensitivity analysis indicated that the increasing order of inputs importance in case of P_s followed the order: maximum dry density MDD (30.5%) > optimum moisture content OMC (28.7%) > swell percent SP (28.1%) > clay fraction CF (9.4%) > plasticity index PI (3.2%) > specific gravity G_s (0.1%), whereas, in case of UCS it followed the order: sand (44%) > PI (26.3%) > MDD (16.8%) > silt (6.8%) > CF (3%) > SP (2.9%) > G_s (0.2%) > OMC (0.03%). Parametric analysis was also performed and the resulting trends were found to be in line with findings of past literature. The comparison results reflected that GEP and ANN are efficacious and reliable techniques for estimation of P_sUCS-ES. The derived mathematical GP-based equations portray the novelty of GEP model and are comparatively simple and reliable. The R_(overall) values for P_sUCS-ES followed the order: ANN > GEP > ANFIS, with all values lying above the acceptable range of 0.80. Hence, all the proposed AI approaches exhibit superior performance, possess high generalization and prediction capability, and evaluate the relative importance of the input parameters in predicting the P_SUCS-ES. The GEP model outperformed the other two models in terms of closeness of training, validation and testing data set with the ideal fit (1:1) slope. Evidently the findings of this study can help researchers, designers and practitioners to readily evaluate the swell-strength characteristics of the widespread expansive soils thus curtailing their environmental vulnerabilities which leads to faster, safer and sustainable construction from the standpoint of environment friendly waste management.
机译:本研究表明了使用三种软计算方法,即人工神经网络(ANNS),自适应神经模糊推理系统(ANFIS)评估膨胀土(P_SUCS-es)的新经验预测模型的开发,以评估膨胀土(P_SUCS-es)的膨胀土(P_sucs-es)和基因表达编程(GEP)。在全面的文献搜索之后,建立了包括168个P_S和145 UCS记录的广泛数据库。九个最具影响力且易于确定的岩土工程参数被视为预测变量。网络经过培训和测试,并将所提出的模型的预测与观察结果进行比较。所有模型的性能使用平均值误差(MAE),根平方误差(RSE),根均线误差(RMSE),NASH-SUTCLIFFE效率(NSE),相关系数(R),回归系数(R〜 2)和相对根均方误差(RRMSE)。敏感性分析表明,在P_S的情况下,输入的输入值的增加顺序:最大干密度MDD(30.5%)>最佳水分含量OMC(28.7%)>溶胀百分比SP(28.1%)>粘土馏分CF(9.4 %)>塑性指数PI(3.2%)>比重G_S(0.1%),而在UCS的情况下,它遵循的顺序:砂(44%)> PI(26.3%)> MDD(16.8%)>淤泥( 6.8%)> CF(3%)> SP(2.9%)> G_S(0.2%)> OMC(0.03%)。还进行了参数分析,发现所产生的趋势与过去文献的结果一致。比较结果反映了GEP和ANN是用于估计P_SUCS-ES的有效且可靠的技术。基于数学GP的等式描绘了GEP模型的新颖性,并且具有相对简单可靠的。 P_SUCS-ES的R_(总体)值跟随订单:ANN> GEP> ANFI,所有值均以高于0.80的可接受范围。因此,所有提议的AI方法都具有卓越的性能,具有高泛化和预测能力,并评估输入参数在预测P_SUCS-es中的相对重要性。 GEP模型在培训,验证和测试数据设置的近距离的情况下表现出其他两个模型,具有理想的拟合(1:1)斜率。显然,本研究的结果可以帮助研究人员,设计师和从业者易于评估广泛膨胀土的膨胀强度特征,从而削减了他们的环境脆弱性,从环境友好的废物管理方面导致更快,更安全和可持续的建设。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号