...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Management >Standardized disaster and climate resilience grading: A global scale empirical analysis of community flood resilience
【24h】

Standardized disaster and climate resilience grading: A global scale empirical analysis of community flood resilience

机译:标准化灾害和气候复原力分级:全球洪水复原力的实证分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Suitable and standardized indicators to track progress in disaster and climate resilience are increasingly considered a key requirement for successfully informing efforts towards effective disaster risk reduction and climate adaptation. Standardized measures of resilience which can be used across different geographical and socioeconomic contexts are however sparse. We present and analyze a standardized community resilience measurement framework for flooding. The corresponding measurement tool is modelled based on and adapted from a so-called 'technical risk grading' approach as used in the insurance sector. The grading approach of indicators is based on a two-step process: (ⅰ) raw data is collected, and (ⅱ) experts grade the indicators, called sources of resilience, based on this data. We test this approach using approximately 1.25 million datapoints collected across more than 118 communities in nine countries. The quantitative analysis is complemented by content analysis to validate the results from a qualitative perspective. We find that some indicators can more easily be graded by looking at raw data alone, while others require a stronger application of expert judgement. We summarize the reasons for this through six key messages. One major finding is that resilience grades related to subjective characteristics such as ability, feel, and trust are far more dependent on expert judgment than on the actual raw data collected. Additionally, the need for expert judgement further increases if graders must extrapolate the whole community picture from limited raw data. Our findings regarding the role of data and grade specifications can inform ways forward for better, more efficient and increasingly robust standardized assessment of resilience. This should help to build global standardized and comparable, yet locally contextual-ized, baseline estimates of the many facets of resilience in order to track progress over time on disaster and climate resilience and inform the implementation of the Paris Agreement, Sendai Framework, and the Sustainable Development Goals.
机译:适合和标准化的指标,以跟踪灾害和气候恢复力的进展越来越多地被认为是成功向有效灾害风险减少和气候适应努力的关键要求。然而,可以在不同地理和社会经济背景下使用的标准化恢复措施稀疏。我们展示并分析了标准化的社区恢复性测量框架,用于洪水。相应的测量工具基于和适应保险部门使用的所谓的“技术风险评分”方法。指标的分级方法是基于两步过程:(Ⅰ)收集原料数据,(Ⅱ)专家级指标,称为弹性源,基于此数据。我们使用在九个国家超过118个社区中收集的大约1250万个数据点测试此方法。通过内容分析补充定量分析,以从定性角度验证结果。我们发现,通过单独查看原始数据,一些指标可以更容易地进行分级,而其他指标则需要更强烈地应用专家判断。我们通过六个关键消息总结了这一点的原因。一个重大发现是与能力,感受和信任等主观特征相关的韧性等级远远依赖于专家判断而不是收集的实际原始数据。此外,如果学生必须从有限的原始数据将整个社区图片推断出整个社区图片,则对专家判断的需求进一步增加。我们关于数据和等级规格的作用的调查结果可以为前进的方式提供更好,更高效,更强大的恢复性的标准化评估。这应该有助于建立全球标准化和可比性,但局部地下的抵制基准估计,以便在灾害和气候复原力上跟踪随着时间的推移以及提供巴黎协议,仙台框架和仙台框架的实施进展。可持续发展目标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号