首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Management >Developing sanitation planning options: A tool for systematic consideration of novel technologies and systems
【24h】

Developing sanitation planning options: A tool for systematic consideration of novel technologies and systems

机译:开发卫生规划选项:用于系统考虑新型技术和系统的工具

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To provide access to sustainable sanitation for the entire world population, novel technologies and systems have been developed. These options are often independent of sewers, water, and energy and therefore promise to be more appropriate for fast-growing urban areas. They also allow for resource recovery and and are adaptable to changing environmental and demographic conditions what makes them more sustainable. More options, however, also enhance planning complexity. Structured decision making (SDM) can help balance opposing interests. Yet, most of the current research focuses on the selection of a preferred option, assuming that a set of appropriate options is available. There is a lack of reproducible methods for the identification of sanitation system planning options that can consider the growing number of available technology and the many possible system configurations. Additionally, there is a lack of data, particularly for novel options, to evaluate the various sustainability criteria for sanitation.To overcome this limitation, we present a novel software supported approach: the SANi-tation sysTem Alternative Generator (Santiago). To be optimally effective, Santiago is required to be integrated into an SDM approach. In this paper, we present all the elements that such an integration requires and illustrate these methods at the case of Arba Minch, a fast growing town in Ethiopia. Based on this example and experiences from other cases, we discuss the lessons learnt and present the advantages potentially brought by Santiago for sanitation planning The integration requires four elements: a set of technologies to be looked at, decision objectives for sustainable sanitation, screening criteria to evalute technology appropriateness, and about the technologies and the casea. The main output is a set of sanitation system options that is locally appropriate, diverse in order to reveal trade-offs, and of a manageable size. To support the definition of decision objectives, we developed a generic objective hierarchy for sustainable sanitation. Because one of the main challenges lies in the quantification of screening criteria, we established the data for 27 criteria and 41 technologies in a library. The case studies showed, that if the integration is successful, then Santiago can provide substantial benefits: (i) it is systematic and reproducible; (ⅱ) it opens up the decision space with novel and potentially more appropriate solutions; (ⅲ) it makes international data accessible for more empirical decision making; (ⅳ) it enables decisions based on strategic objectives in line with the sustainable development goals; (ⅴ) it allows to prioritise appropriate and resource efficient systems right from the beginning (ⅵ) and it contributes to a more citywide inclusive approach by birding strategic objectives with an area-based appropriateness assessment. The here presented approach enables the prioritisation of appropriate and resource efficient sanitation technologies and systems in strategic planning. Thereby this approach contributes to SDG 6.2, 6.3, and 11, sustainable sanitation for all.
机译:提供对整个世界人口的可持续卫生,开发了新型技术和系统。这些选择通常独立于下水道,水和能源,因此承诺更适合快速增长的城市地区。它们还允许资源恢复,并适应改变环境和人口统计条件,使其更加可持续。然而,更多选项也增强了规划复杂性。结构性决策(SDM)可以帮助平衡反对利益。然而,大多数当前研究侧重于选​​择优选选项,假设可以使用一组适当的选项。缺乏可重复的方法来确定卫生系统规划选项,可以考虑越来越多的可用技术和许多可能的系统配置。此外,缺乏数据,特别是对于新颖的选择,以评估卫生设施的各种可持续性标准。克服这一限制,我们提出了一种新颖的软件支持的方法:Sani-Tation System替代发电机(Santiago)。为了最佳效率,要求圣地亚哥融入SDM方法。在本文中,我们提出了这种整合所需的所有元素,并在埃塞俄比亚的快速生长镇的Arba Minch的情况下说明这些方法。基于其他案例的经验和经验,我们讨论了学习的经验教训,并呈现了圣地亚哥为卫生规划带来的优势,整合需要四个要素:一系列技术可以查看,可持续卫生设施的决策目标,筛选标准评估技术适当性,以及技术和卡腹。主要产出是一系列卫生系统选项,该选项是本地合适的,以揭示权衡和可管理的大小。为了支持决策目标的定义,我们为可持续卫生制定了一般客观层次结构。因为其中一个主要挑战在于筛选标准的量化,所以我们在图书馆中建立了27个标准和41技术的数据。案例研究表明,如果整合成功,则圣地亚哥可以提供大量的益处:(i)它是系统性和可重复的; (二)它与新颖且可能更合适的解决方案开辟了决策空间; (Ⅲ)它使国际数据可用于更经验的决策; (ⅳ)它能够根据可持续发展目标基于战略目标的决策; (ⅴ)它允许从一开始(ⅵ)优先考虑适当的资源有效的系统,并且通过与基于地区的适当性评估的战略目标进行战略目标,有助于更具全国性的包容性方法。这里提出的方法能够在战略规划中优先考虑适当的和资源有效的卫生技术和系统。因此,这种方法有助于所有人的SDG 6.2,6.3和11,所有人的可持续卫生设施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号