首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Management >Are Protected Areas undervalued? An asset-based analysis of Brazilian Protected Area Management Plans
【24h】

Are Protected Areas undervalued? An asset-based analysis of Brazilian Protected Area Management Plans

机译:保护区的价值被低估了吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

When effectively managed, Protected Areas (PAs) are capable of generating multiple forms of value, both tangible and intangible, for individuals and institutions. However, the value-generating potential of many PM may be going unrecognized and underutilized due to a limited view of management objectives as codified within the parks' Management Plan. Here, we test the hypothesis that PAs are undervalued by evaluating the degree to which Management Plans from four different Brazilian designations (National Parks, Ecological Stations, Environmental Protected Areas and National Forests) recognize different categories of nature-related assets (entities, attributes and relationships that can be protected, managed and/or invested in to generate forms of value). Based on a recently proposed PA Asset Framework, we identify what assets are mentioned by Management Plans and what assets are under-represented. Our results indicate that Human and Cultural assets are the least represented of the major asset classes (Biophysical, Human, Infrastructural, Institutional and Cultural) and that many asset sub-categories that should reasonably be expected to be present in Management Plans are frequently not mentioned. Assets that are not being considered in Management Plans are, by extension, less likely to be managed and/or invested in. Given the strong similarities between PA Management Plans in different countries, these results probably reflect a general trend. A simple way to ensure that PM maximize the value generating potential (within the context of their designation) would be to survey their assets and generate a 'PA Asset Management and Investment Plan' to supplement and support existing planning documentation.
机译:通过有效管理,保护区(PA)能够为个人和机构创造多种形式的有形和无形价值。但是,由于公园管理计划中对管理目标的看法有限,许多PM的价值创造潜力可能无法得到认识和利用。在这里,我们通过评估来自四个不同巴西名称(国家公园,生态站,环境保护区和国家森林)的管理计划识别与自然相关资产(实体,属性和属性)的不同类别的程度,检验了保护区被低估的假设。可以被保护,管理和/或投资以产生价值形式的关系)。基于最近提出的PA资产框架,我们确定管理计划中提到哪些资产以及哪些资产代表不足。我们的结果表明,人力和文化资产在主要资产类别(生物物理,人力,基础设施,机构和文化)中所占的比例最小,并且经常没有提及应合理预期管理计划中应包含的许多资产子类别。扩展而言,未在管理计划中考虑的资产进行管理和/或投资的可能性较小。鉴于不同国家的PA管理计划之间的相似性很强,这些结果可能反映了总体趋势。确保PM最大化其创造价值潜力的简单方法(在其指定范围内)将是调查其资产并生成一个“ PA资产管理和投资计划”以补充和支持现有的计划文档。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号