...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Management >Does mode matter? A comparison of telephone, mail, and in-person treatments in contingent valuation surveys
【24h】

Does mode matter? A comparison of telephone, mail, and in-person treatments in contingent valuation surveys

机译:模式重要吗?或有估值调查中电话,邮件和面对面处理的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The choice of survey mode in contingent valuation research has long been debated in the literature. However, there is limited evidence as to how mode impacts behavior. Using an identical survey administered with telephone, mail, and in-person interviews, this is the first research to examine mode effects using all three commonly employed modes in contingent valuation research. Results show that there is some evidence of social desirability bias in the telephone survey. In addition, the role of income in the decision-making process is an important consideration.
机译:或有估值研究中调查模式的选择在文献中一直存在争议。但是,关于模式如何影响行为的证据有限。使用通过电话,邮件和面对面访谈进行的相同调查,这是第一项使用或有估值研究中所有三种常用模式来检验模式影响的研究。结果表明,电话调查中有一些社会可取性偏见的证据。此外,收入在决策过程中的作用是重要的考虑因素。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Environmental Management 》 |2009年第11期| 3528-3533| 共6页
  • 作者

    Kelly B. Maguire;

  • 作者单位

    US. Environmental Protection Agency, National Center for Environmental Economics, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW (MC 1809T), Washington, DC 20460, United States;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    contingent valuation; survey mode; hurdle model;

    机译:或有估值调查模式;跨栏模型;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号