首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Management >Comparing hiking, mountain biking and horse riding impacts on vegetation and soils in Australia and the United States of America
【24h】

Comparing hiking, mountain biking and horse riding impacts on vegetation and soils in Australia and the United States of America

机译:比较徒步旅行,山地自行车和骑马对澳大利亚和美国的植被和土壤的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Hiking, horse riding and mountain biking are popular in protected areas in Australia and the United States of America. To help inform the often contentious deliberations about use of protected areas for these three types of activities, we review recreation ecology research in both countries. Many impacts on vegetation, soils and trails are similar for the three activities, although there can be differences in severity. Impacts include damage to existing trails, soil erosion, compaction and nutrification, changes in hydrology, trail widening, exposure of roots, rocks and bedrock. There can be damage to plants including reduction in vegetation height and biomass, changes in species composition, creation of informal trails and the spread of weeds and plant pathogens. Due to differences in evolutionary history, impacts on soil and vegetation can be greater in Australia than in the USA. There are specific social and biophysical impacts of horses such as those associated with manure and urine, grazing and the construction and use of tethering yards and fences. Mountain bike specific impacts include soil and vegetation damage from skidding and the construction of unauthorised trails, jumps, bridges and other trail technical features. There are gaps in the current research that should be filled by additional research: (1) on horse and mountain bike impacts to complement those on hiking. The methods used need to reflect patterns of actual usage and be suitable for robust statistical analysis; (2) that directly compares types and severity of impacts among activities; and (3) on the potential for each activity to contribute to the spread of weeds and plant pathogens. Additional research will assist managers and users of protected areas in understanding the relative impacts of these activities, and better ways to manage them. It may not quell the debates among users, managers and conservationists, but it will help put it on a more scientific footing.
机译:远足,骑马和山地自行车在澳大利亚和美利坚合众国的保护区很受欢迎。为了帮助介绍有关在这三种类型的活动中使用保护区的通常有争议的讨论,我们回顾了两国的休闲生态学研究。这三种活动对植被,土壤和小径的许多影响是相似的,尽管严重程度可能有所不同。影响包括对现有小径的破坏,土壤侵蚀,压实和营养化,水文变化,小径加宽,根,岩石和基岩暴露。对植物的损害可能包括植被高度和生物量的减少,物种组成的变化,非正式线索的产生以及杂草和植物病原体的传播。由于进化史的差异,澳大利亚对土壤和植被的影响可能大于美国。马会产生特定的社会和生物物理影响,例如与粪便和尿液,放牧以及栓系场和围栏的建造和使用有关。山地自行车的特定影响包括由于打滑造成的土壤和植被破坏以及未经授权的步道,跳跃,桥梁和其他步道技术特征的构造。当前的研究存在不足之处,应通过其他研究来弥补:(1)对马和山地自行车的影响,以补充对徒步旅行的影响。使用的方法需要反映实际使用的模式,并适合进行可靠的统计分析; (2)直接比较活动之间影响的类型和严重性; (3)每种活动有可能促进杂草和植物病原体的传播。进一步的研究将帮助保护区的管理者和使用者了解这些活动的相对影响,以及更好的管理方式。它可能不会平息使用者,管理者和保护主义者之间的争论,但将有助于使其更具科学基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号