首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Management >Effectiveness of vegetated filter strips in retention of Escherichia coli and Salmonella from swine manure slurry
【24h】

Effectiveness of vegetated filter strips in retention of Escherichia coli and Salmonella from swine manure slurry

机译:植被滤纸条对猪粪便中大肠杆菌和沙门氏菌的截留效果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Vegetated filter strips (VFS) are commonly recommended as a best management practice to prevent manure-borne microorganisms from reaching surface water resources. However, relatively little is known about the efficacy of VFS in mitigating bacterial runoff from land-applied swine manure. A field lysimeter study was designed to evaluate the effect of surface soil hydrologic conditions and vegetation on the retention of swine manure-borne Escherichia coli and Salmonella under simulated rainfall conditions. Experimental plots (6.5 m × 3.9 m) were set on a 5% slope lysimeter with loamy topsoil, clay loam or loam subsoil and a controllable groundwater level. Three small flow-intercepting miniflumes were installed 4.5 m from the plot's top, while all remaining runoff was collected in a gutter at the bottom. Plots were divided into bare soil and grass vegetation and upper surface soil moisture before rainfall events was controlled by the subsurface groundwater level. Swine manure slurry inoculated with £ coli and Salmonella, and with added bromide tracer, was applied on the top of the plots and simultaneously initiated the simulated rainfall. Runoff was collected and analyzed every 5 min. No substantial differences between retention of £ coli and Salmonella were found. In initially wet soil surface conditions, there was limited infiltration both in bare and in vegetated plots; almost all bromide and about 30% of bacteria were recovered in runoff water. In initially dry soil surface conditions, there were substantial discrepancies between bare and vegetated plots. In bare plots, recoveries of runoff water, bromide and bacteria under dry conditions were comparable to wet conditions. However, in dry vegetated plots, from 50% to 75% of water was lost to infiltration, while bromide recoveries ranged from 14 to 36% and bacteria recovery was only 5%. Substantial intraplot heterogeneity was revealed by the data from miniflumes. GIS analysis of the plot microtopography showed that miniflumes located in the zones of flow convergence collected the majority of bacteria. Overall, the efficiency of VFS, with respect to the retention of swine manure bacteria, varied dramatically depending upon the hydrologic soil surface condition. Consequently, VFS recommendations should account for expected amounts of surface soil water saturation as well as the relative soil water storage capacity of the VFS.
机译:通常建议使用植物滤纸(VFS)作为防止粪便传播的微生物进入地表水资源的最佳管理方法。但是,关于VFS减轻土地施用的猪粪中细菌径流的功效知之甚少。设计了野外溶渗仪研究,以评估表层土壤水文条件和植被在模拟降雨条件下对猪粪传播的大肠杆菌和沙门氏菌保留的影响。实验地块(6.5 m×3.9 m)设置在坡度为5%的渗漏测定仪上,壤土为壤土,黏土壤土或壤土或壤土,地下水位可控。在该小区的顶部4.5 m处安装了三个小型截流微型水槽,而所有剩余的径流都收集在底部的水槽中。在通过地下地下水位控制降雨事件之前,将地块分为裸露的土壤和草木植被以及上层土壤水分。将接种有大肠杆菌和沙门氏菌并添加了溴化物示踪剂的猪粪浆施于样地顶部,并同时启动模拟降雨。每5分钟收集一次径流并进行分析。在大肠杆菌和沙门氏菌的保留之间没有发现实质性差异。在最初潮湿的土壤表面条件下,裸露和植被覆盖区的入渗均受到限制。几乎所有的溴化物和约30%的细菌都在径流水中被回收。在最初干燥的土壤表面条件下,裸露地和植被地之间存在很大差异。在裸露的土地上,在干燥条件下的径流水,溴化物和细菌的回收率可与潮湿条件相媲美。但是,在干燥的植被地块中,有50%至75%的水因渗透而损失,而溴化物的回收率则在14%至36%之间,细菌的回收率仅为5%。小型流的数据揭示了明显的内线异质性。地块微地形的GIS分析表明,位于流动汇聚区的小水槽收集了大多数细菌。总体而言,VFS的效率相对于猪粪便细菌的保留,随土壤水文条件的不同而有很大差异。因此,VFS的建议应考虑VFS的预期表层土壤水饱和度以及相对土壤储水量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号