首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Management >Forest fire management to avoid unintended consequences: A case study of Portugal using system dynamics
【24h】

Forest fire management to avoid unintended consequences: A case study of Portugal using system dynamics

机译:森林火灾管理避免意外后果:使用系统动力学的葡萄牙案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Forest fires are a serious management challenge in many regions, complicating the appropriate allocation to suppression and prevention efforts. Using a System Dynamics (SD) model, this paper explores how interactions between physical and political systems in forest fire management impact the effectiveness of different allocations. A core issue is that apparently sound management can have unintended consequences. An instinctive management response to periods of worsening fire severity is to increase fire suppression capacity, an approach with immediate appeal as it directly treats the symptom of devastating fires and appeases the public. However, the SD analysis indicates that a policy emphasizing suppression can degrade the long-run effectiveness of forest fire management. By crowding out efforts to preventative fuel removal, it exacerbates fuel loads and leads to greater fires, which further balloon suppression budgets. The business management literature refers to this problem as the firefighting trap, wherein focus on fixing problems diverts attention from preventing them, and thus leads to inferior outcomes. The paper illustrates these phenomena through a case study of Portugal, showing that a balanced approach to suppression and prevention efforts can mitigate the self-reinforcing consequences of this trap, and better manage long-term fire damages. These insights can help policymakers and fire managers better appreciate the interconnected systems in which their authorities reside and the dynamics that may undermine seemingly rational management decisions.
机译:在许多地区,森林大火是一项严重的管理挑战,使适当的压制和预防工作复杂化。本文使用系统动力学(SD)模型,探索森林火灾管理中物理系统和政治系统之间的相互作用如何影响不同分配的有效性。一个核心问题是,合理的管理显然会产生意想不到的后果。对于火灾严重程度不断恶化的时期,本能的管理对策是增加灭火能力,这种方法具有直接吸引力,因为它可以直接处理毁灭性大火的症状并安抚公众。但是,SD分析表明,强调抑制的政策可能会降低森林火灾管理的长期有效性。通过集中精力进行预防性的燃料清除,它加剧了燃料负荷并导致更大的火灾,从而进一步增加了气球抑制预算。商业管理文献将这个问题称为“消防陷阱”,其中着重于解决问题会使注意力转移到预防问题上,从而导致不良结果。本文通过对葡萄牙的案例研究说明了这些现象,表明采取平衡的镇压和预防措施可以减轻陷阱的自我强化后果,并更好地管理长期火灾损失。这些见解可以帮助决策者和消防经理更好地理解其权限所在的互连系统以及可能破坏看似合理的管理决策的动态。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Environmental Management》 |2013年第30期|1-9|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Engineering Systems Division, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA;

    Engineering Systems Division, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA;

    INESC TEC, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, Rua Dr. Roberto Mas, 378, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal;

    Crupo Portucel Soporcet, Apartado 55, 2901-861 Setubal, Portugal;

    INESC TEC, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, Rua Dr. Roberto Mas, 378, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Forest fires; System dynamics; Feedback; Simulation;

    机译:森林火灾;系统动力学;反馈;模拟;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号