首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Management >Economics, socio-ecological resilience and ecosystem services
【24h】

Economics, socio-ecological resilience and ecosystem services

机译:经济学,社会生态适应力和生态系统服务

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The economic process transforms raw materials and energy into economic products and waste. On a finite planet, continued economic growth threatens to surpass critical socio-ecological thresholds and undermine ecosystem services upon which humans and all other species depend. For most systems, whether such thresholds exist, where they lie and whether they are reversible cannot be known with certainty until they are crossed. We argue that our central economic challenge is to maintain the resilience of the current socio-ecological regime. We must reduce net impacts of economic activity to avoid critical ecological thresholds while ensuring economic necessities. Conventional economists pursue continuous growth as the central goal of economic activity, and assume that the price mechanism and technological breakthroughs ensure system resilience. Unfortunately, the price mechanism fails to address ecological thresholds because it ignores unowned ecosystem services, and fails to address economic thresholds because it ignores the needs of the poorest individuals, who live on the edge of them. Panarchy theory suggests that systems go through a cycle of growth, conservation, release and renewal. Managing a subsystem too long for growth or conservation-which many consider to be the goal of sustainability-actually threatens to collapse the higher-level system upon which that subsystem depends. Black Swan theory suggests we should seek to reduce the risk of catastrophic thresholds and promote the likelihood of technological breakthroughs. Economic degrowth, or planned release, is required to avoid catastrophic collapse. At the same time, publicly funded, open source information can help stimulate the technological breakthroughs economists count on to ensure resilience.
机译:经济过程将原材料和能源转化为经济产品和废物。在有限的星球上,持续的经济增长有可能超越社会生态的临界阈值,并破坏人类和所有其他物种赖以生存的生态系统服务。对于大多数系统而言,只有在超过阈值后才能确定性地确定它们是否存在,位于何处以及是否可逆。我们认为,我们的主要经济挑战是维持当前社会生态体制的弹性。我们必须减少经济活动的净影响,避免在确保经济必要性的同时避免关键的生态阈值。传统经济学家将持续增长作为经济活动的中心目标,并假设价格机制和技术突破确保了系统的弹性。不幸的是,价格机制未能解决生态阈值,因为它忽略了无主的生态系统服务,而未能解决经济阈值,因为它忽略了生活在边缘的最贫穷个体的需求。全权主义理论表明,系统经历了增长,保存,释放和更新的循环。对子系统的管理时间过长,以至于无法进行增长或保护(许多人认为这是可持续性的目标),实际上可能会使该子系统所依赖的更高级别的系统崩溃。 Black Swan理论建议我们应该设法降低灾难性阈值的风险,并提高技术突破的可能性。为了避免灾难性的崩溃,需要经济衰退或计划释放。同时,由公共资助的开放源信息可以帮助刺激经济学家指望确保弹性的技术突破。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号