...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Management >Application of risk-based multiple criteria decision analysis for selection of the best agricultural scenario for effective watershed management
【24h】

Application of risk-based multiple criteria decision analysis for selection of the best agricultural scenario for effective watershed management

机译:基于风险的多准则决策分析在选择最佳农业方案以进行有效流域管理中的应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Effective watershed management requires the evaluation of agricultural best management practice (BMP) scenarios which carefully consider the relevant environmental, economic, and social criteria involved. In the Multiple Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) process, scenarios are first evaluated and then ranked to determine the most desirable outcome for the particular watershed. The main challenge of this process is the accurate identification of the best solution for the watershed in question, despite the various risk attitudes presented by the associated decision-makers (DMs). This paper introduces a novel approach for implementation of the MCDM process based on a comparative neutral risk/risk-based decision analysis, which results in the selection of the most desirable scenario for use in the entire watershed. At the sub-basin level, each scenario includes multiple BMPs with scores that have been calculated using the criteria derived from two cases of neutral risk and risk-based decision-making. The simple additive weighting (SAW) operator is applied for use in neutral risk decision-making, while the ordered weighted averaging (OWA) and induced OWA (IOWA) operators are effective for risk-based decision-making. At the watershed level, the BMP scores of the sub-basins are aggregated to calculate each scenarios' combined goodness measurements; the most desirable scenario for the entire watershed is then selected based on the combined goodness measurements. Our final results illustrate the type of operator and risk attitudes needed to satisfy the relevant criteria within the number of sub-basins, and how they ultimately affect the final ranking of the given scenarios. The methodology proposed here has been successfully applied to the Honeyoey Creek-Pine Creek watershed in Michigan, USA to evaluate various BMP scenarios and determine the best solution for both the stakeholders and the overall stream health.
机译:有效的流域管理要求评估农业最佳管理实践(BMP)方案,该方案要仔细考虑所涉及的相关环境,经济和社会标准。在多标准决策(MCDM)流程中,首先评估场景,然后对场景进行排名,以确定特定分水岭的最理想结果。尽管相关决策者(DM)提出了各种风险态度,但此过程的主要挑战是准确确定有关流域的最佳解决方案。本文基于比较中性的基于风险/风险的决策分析,介绍了一种用于实施MCDM流程的新颖方法,该方法可为整个流域选择最理想的方案。在次流域级别,每个方案都包含多个BMP,这些BMP的分数是使用从中性风险和基于风险的决策两种情况得出的标准计算得出的。简单加性加权(SAW)运算符用于中性风险决策,而有序加权平均(OWA)和诱导OWA(IOWA)运算符对于基于风险的决策有效。在分水岭级别,汇总各个子流域的BMP分数,以计算每个方案的组合善度测量;然后根据组合的优度测量结果,为整个流域选择最理想的方案。我们的最终结果说明了在子盆地数量内满足相关标准所需的运营商类型和风险态度,以及它们最终如何影响给定场景的最终排名。本文提出的方法已成功应用于美国密歇根州的Honeyoey Creek-Pine Creek流域,以评估各种BMP方案,并为利益相关者和整个河流健康确定最佳解决方案。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Environmental Management 》 |2016年第1期| 260-272| 共13页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Civil Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (FUM), Mashhad, Iran,Department of Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering, Michigan State University (MSU), East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA;

    Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran,Department of Civil and Environmental Eng. and Tufts Institute of the Environment, Tufts University, Medford, MA, 02155, USA,Sociotechnical Systems Research Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 02142 USA;

    Department of Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering, Michigan State University (MSU), East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA,Farrall Agriculture Engineering Hall, 524 S. Shaw Lane, Room 225, East Lansing, MI, 48824-1323, USA;

    Department of Civil Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (FUM), Mashhad, Iran;

    Department of Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering, Michigan State University (MSU), East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA;

    Department of Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering, Michigan State University (MSU), East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Effective watershed management; Simple additive weighting; Ordered weighted averaging; Induced ordered weighted averaging; Scenario ranking;

    机译:有效的流域管理;简单的添加剂加权;有序加权平均;诱导有序加权平均;场景排名;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号