首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Management >Estimated seepage rates from selected ditches, ponds, and lakes at the Camas National Wildlife Refuge, eastern Idaho
【24h】

Estimated seepage rates from selected ditches, ponds, and lakes at the Camas National Wildlife Refuge, eastern Idaho

机译:爱达荷州卡马斯国家野生动物保护区部分沟渠,池塘和湖泊的估计渗透率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Camas National Wildlife Refuge (Refuge) in eastern Idaho, established in 1937, contains wetlands, ponds, and wet meadows that are essential resting and feeding habitat for migratory birds and nesting habitat for waterfowl. Initially, natural sources of water supported these habitats. However, during the past few decades, changes in climate and surrounding land use have altered and reduced natural groundwater and surface-water inflows, resulting in a 5-meter decline in the water table and an earlier, and more frequent, occurrence of no flow in Camas Creek at the Refuge. Due to these changes in water availability, water management that includes extensive groundwater pumping is now necessary to maintain the wetlands, ponds, and wet meadows. These water management activities have proven to be inefficient and expensive, and the Refuge is seeking alternative water-management options that are more efficient and less expensive. More efficient water management at the Refuge may be possible through knowledge of the seepage rates from ditches, ponds, and lakes at the Refuge. With this knowledge, water-management efficiency may be improved by natural means through selective use of water bodies with the smallest seepage rates or through engineering efforts to minimize seepage losses from water bodies with the largest seepage rates. The U.S. Geological Survey performed field studies in 2015 and 2016 to estimate seepage rates for selected ditches, ponds, and lakes at the Refuge. Estimated seepage rates from ponds and lakes ranged over an order of magnitude, from 3.4 ± 0.2 to 103.0 ± 0.5 mm/d, with larger seepage rates calculated for Big Pond and Redhead Pond, intermediate seepage rates calculated for Two-way Pond, and smaller seepages rates calculated for the south arm of Sandhole Lake. Estimated seepage losses from two reaches of Main Diversion Ditch were 21 ± 2 and 17 ± 2 percent/km. These losses represent seepage rates of about 890 and 860 mm/d, which are one-to two-orders-of-magnitude larger than seepage rates from the ponds and lake. The depth-integrated vertical hydraulic conductivity (K_V) for sediment underlying the ponds and lake was the primary control of seepage rates. The K_v's were 30 and 34 m/d for Big Pond, 14 and 18 m/d for Toomey Pond, 8 and 10 m/d for Two-way Pond, and 47 m/d for the north arm of Sandhole Lake.
机译:爱达荷州东部的卡马斯国家野生动物保护区(Refuge)成立于1937年,拥有湿地,池塘和湿润的草地,它们是候鸟的基本栖息和觅食栖息地,也是水禽的栖息地。最初,自然水源为这些栖息地提供了支持。然而,在过去的几十年中,气候和周围土地利用的变化已经改变并减少了自然地下水和地表水的流入,导致地下水位下降了5米,更早地,更频繁地出现了无水的情况。在卡马斯克里克(避难所)。由于可用水量的这些变化,为了维持湿地,池塘和湿地草甸,现在必须进行包括大量抽水的水管理。这些水管理活动已被证明是低效且昂贵的,并且避难所正在寻求更高效,更便宜的替代水管理方案。通过了解避难所的沟渠,池塘和湖泊的渗漏率,可以在避难所进行更有效的水管理。掌握了这些知识,可以通过自然方式通过选择使用渗透率最小的水体或通过工程工作来最大程度地减少渗透率最大的水体的渗漏损失来提高水管理效率。美国地质调查局在2015年和2016年进行了实地研究,以估计避难所中某些沟渠,池塘和湖泊的渗漏率。池塘和湖泊的估计渗透率范围在3.4±0.2到103.0±0.5 mm / d的数量级之间,其中大池塘和红发池塘的渗透率较大,双向池塘的渗透率中等,较小沙洞湖南臂的渗流率。估计两个主导流沟的渗漏损失分别为21±2%和17±2%/ km。这些损失代表了大约890和860 mm / d的渗漏率,比池塘和湖泊的渗漏率大了一到两个数量级。池塘和湖泊下面的沉积物的深度综合垂直水力传导率(K_V)是渗流率的主要控制因素。大池塘的K_v为30和34 m / d,Toomey池塘的K_v为14和18 m / d,双向池塘的K_v为8和10 m / d,Sandhole湖北臂的K_v为47 m / d。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号