首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Management >Review of national methodologies for rivers' hydromorphological assessment: A comparative approach in France, Romania, and Croatia
【24h】

Review of national methodologies for rivers' hydromorphological assessment: A comparative approach in France, Romania, and Croatia

机译:河流水文形态学评估国家方法论的回顾:法国,罗马尼亚和克罗地亚的比较方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Conducting hydromorphological assessments for evaluating the ecological status of rivers is a key requirement of the Directive 2000/60/EC (Water Framework Directive – WFD) within European Union (EU) Member States. This paper aims at understanding how this requirement was implemented, through an original comparative review of methodologies for rivers' hydromorphological assessment in three EU Member States, which joined the EU at different times, and with many differences in terms of hydrographic features, socio-economic and water management systems: France, Romania, and Croatia. More precisely, the paper aims at identifying and understanding the main principles guiding the hydromorphological assessment methodologies, elements and data used, giving an overview of the results of hydromorphological river status assessment, and concluding on the stage of hydromorphological assessment implementation. France developed numerous methodologies for physical habitat survey since the 1990s and it is currently conducting a rigorous hydromorphological field survey, but it does not yet have any national methodology for rivers' hydromorphological status assessment, nevertheless foreseen for the next cycle of the WFD. Besides, Romania and Croatia have already started the assessment of the hydromorphological status of rivers within the two cycles of the River Basin Management Plans and are making efforts to improve the hydromorphological monitoring activity. The methods generally differ in indicators, data used, and spatial scale of analysis, which makes it difficult to compare the results of the assessments. Despite a common water policy, the methodological dissimilarities seem to be rather usual between EU Member States. Therefore, the standardization of methodologies appears to be necessary, but the current results could be useful for setting priorities for river restoration and for achieving a better status at a national scale.
机译:进行水形态评估以评估河流的生态状况是欧盟(EU)成员国内部的2000/60 / EC指令(水框架指令-WFD)的一项关键要求。本文旨在通过对三个欧盟成员国河流水文形态评估方法的原始比较审查,来了解这一要求的实施方式,这三个成员国在不同时期加入了欧盟,并且在水文特征,社会经济方面存在许多差异。和水管理系统:法国,罗马尼亚和克罗地亚。更准确地说,本文旨在确定和理解指导水形态评估方法,所用要素和数据的主要原则,概述水形态河流状态评估的结果,并总结水形态评估实施的阶段。自1990年代以来,法国开发了许多用于物理栖息地调查的方法,目前正在进行严格的水文形态现场调查,但尚无关于河流水文形态状况评估的任何国家方法,但可以预见到WFD的下一个周期。此外,罗马尼亚和克罗地亚已经开始在“流域管理计划”的两个周期内评估河流的水文形态状况,并正在努力改善水文形态监测活动。这些方法通常在指标,使用的数据和分析的空间规模上有所不同,这使得比较评估结果变得困难。尽管有共同的水政策,但欧盟成员国之间的方法差异似乎相当普遍。因此,方法的标准化似乎是必要的,但是当前的结果对于确定河流恢复的优先次序以及在全国范围内取得更好的地位可能是有用的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号