首页> 外文期刊>Journal of environmental law >Ecological Status as a Legal Construct-Determining its Legal and Ecological Meaning
【24h】

Ecological Status as a Legal Construct-Determining its Legal and Ecological Meaning

机译:生态地位作为法律建构-决定其法律和生态意义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The Water Framework Directive is innovative in EU law, and the informal role of the Common Implementation Strategy (CIS) guidance documents makes the Directive's regulative space complex. This analysis raises questions about the legitimacy of interpretative elements found in CIS guidance. The CIS interpretations seem to result in only one element of 'ecological status' being assessed (structure, and not functioning), generally weakening the obligation of 'good ecological status'. Using ecological knowledge in guidance that contradicts the main legal construct on which it is based raises questions about the CIS, and also the 'legal effect' bar established by the Court of Justice, as the CIS may produce guidance documents to the Directive that alter the legally binding objective, although not providing enough legal effects for a review.
机译:《水框架指令》在欧盟法律中是创新的,《共同实施策略》(CIS)指导文件的非正式作用使该指令的法规空间变得复杂。该分析提出了有关独联体指南中解释性要素是否合法的问题。独联体的解释似乎只导致对“生态状况”的一个要素(结构,而不是功能)的评估,通常削弱了“良好生态状况”的义务。将生态知识用于与该法律所依据的主要法律结构相抵触的指导中,会引起对CIS的质疑,也引起了法院设立的“法律效力”标准的质疑,因为CIS可能会针对该指令产生指导文件,从而改变该指令。具有法律约束力的目标,尽管没有为审查提供足够的法律效力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号