...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Economics and Management >Redistribution and pollution taxes with non-linear Engel curves
【24h】

Redistribution and pollution taxes with non-linear Engel curves

机译:用非线性恩格尔曲线再分配和污染税

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper analyses optimal corrective taxation and optimal income redistribution. The Pigouvian pollution tax is higher if pollution damages disproportionally hurt the poor due to equity weighting of pollution damages. Moreover, under general utility functions, optimal pollution taxes should be set below the Pigouvian tax if the poor spend a disproportionate fraction of their income on polluting goods. However, if Engel curves are linear, optimal pollution taxes should follow the first-best rule for the Pigouvian corrective tax even if the government wants to redistribute income and the poor spend a disproportional part of their income on polluting goods. The often-used quasi-linear, CES and Stone-Geary utility functions all have linear Engel curves. If Engel curves are linear, and if pollution taxes are not optimised, Pareto-improving green tax reforms exist that move the pollution tax closer to the Pigouvian tax. Simulations demonstrate that optimal corrective taxes should be Pigouvian if the demand for polluting goods is derived from a LES demand system, but deviate from the Pigouvian taxes if demand for polluting goods demand is derived from a PIGLOG demand system. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:本文分析了最佳的纠正税和最佳收入再分配。如果污染损害因污染损害的股权而对穷人造成不成比例地伤害穷人,猪污染税更高。此外,如果穷人在污染物的收入不成比例的收入,应在猪乌维亚税下设立最佳污染税。但是,如果Engel曲线是线性的,最佳污染税应遵循Pigouvian矫正税的最佳规则,即使政府希望重新分配收入,穷人将在污染物货物上花费消费的部分收入。通常使用的准线性,CES和石齿轮效用功能都具有线性engel曲线。如果Engel曲线是线性的,如果污染税未得到优化,则存在改善绿色税制改革,以便将污染税更接近Pigouvian税。仿真表明,如果污染物的需求来自LES需求系统,则最佳纠正税应该是Pigouvian,但如果捕获货物需求的需求来自仔猪需求系统,则偏离Pigouvian税。 (c)2019 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号