首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Economics and Management >The real effect of legal institutions: Environmental courts and firm environmental protection expenditure
【24h】

The real effect of legal institutions: Environmental courts and firm environmental protection expenditure

机译:法律机构的真正效果:环境法庭和坚定的环境保护支出

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper evaluates the real effects of environmental justice reform on environmental governance at the firm level. Using the establishment of environmental courts in China as a quasi-natural experiment, our difference-in-differences estimation shows that: (1) environmental courts significantly enhance environmental investment by firms, and this relationship is robust to different specifications and alternative measures; (2) three possible channels are the improved levels of justice and enforcement of environmental protection, and the mitigation of local government intervention; (3) our findings are particularly pronounced in subsamples with severe local protectionism, state-owned enterprises (SOEs), and non-SOEs with political connections; (4) at the city-level, environmental courts significantly increase air quality and promote cities to cross the inflection point of the environmental Kuznets curve earlier. Overall, this paper reveals the micro-mechanisms behind the real effects of environmental justice on firm environmental investment, thus providing timely implications for regulators concerned with environmental protection. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:本文在公司层面评估了环境司法改革对环境治理的实际影响。通过在中国建立环境法院作为准自然实验,我们的差异估计表明:(1)环境法院显着提高了企业对环境的投资,并且这种关系对于不同的规格和替代措施具有鲁棒性; (2)三种可能的渠道是:提高司法公正水平和加强环境保护;以及减轻地方政府的干预; (3)我们的发现在带有严重地方保护主义,国有企业和具有政治联系的非国有企业的子样本中尤为明显。 (4)在城市一级,环境法院大大提高了空气质量,并促使城市更早地越过了环境库兹涅茨曲线的拐点。总体而言,本文揭示了环境正义对企业环境投资的实际影响背后的微观机制,从而为关注环境保护的监管机构提供了及时的启示。 (C)2019 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号