...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Economics and Management >Emissions taxes versus intensity standards: Second-best environmental policies with incomplete regulation
【24h】

Emissions taxes versus intensity standards: Second-best environmental policies with incomplete regulation

机译:排放税与强度标准:监管不完善的第二好的环境政策

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The best emissions tax or emissions cap may be an inferior instrument under incomplete regulation (leakage). Without leakage, an intensity standard (regulating emissions per unit of output) is inferior due to an implicit output subsidy. This inefficiency can be eliminated by an additional consumption tax. With leakage, an intensity standard can dominate the optimal emissions tax, since the implicit output subsidy prevents leakage. The addition of a consumption tax improves an intensity standard's efficiency, may prevent leakage, and may be efficient. Comparing intensity standards to output-based updating shows that the latter dominates if updating is sufficiently flexible.
机译:最佳的排放税或排放上限可能是监管不完善(泄漏)下的劣等工具。如果没有泄漏,则由于隐含的输出补贴,强度标准(调节每单位输出的排放量)较差。这种低效率可以通过额外的消费税来消除。对于泄漏,强度标准可以控制最佳排放税,因为隐性的输出补贴可以防止泄漏。增加消费税可以提高强度标准的效率,可以防止泄漏,并且可以提高效率。将强度标准与基于输出的更新进行比较表明,如果更新足够灵活,则后者将占主导地位。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号