...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Economics and Management >The welfare effects of fuel conservation policies in a dual-fuel car market: Evidence from India
【24h】

The welfare effects of fuel conservation policies in a dual-fuel car market: Evidence from India

机译:双燃料汽车市场中燃油节约政策的福利影响:来自印度的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

We estimate a model of vehicle choice and kilometers driven to analyze the long-run impacts of fuel conservation policies in the Indian car market. We simulate the effects of petrol and diesel fuel taxes and a diesel car tax, taking into account their interactions with the pre-existing petrol fuel tax and car sales taxes. At levels sufficient to reduce total fuel consumption by 7%, the increased diesel and petrol fuel taxes both yield deadweight losses (net of externalities) of about 4 (2010) Rs./L,. However, at levels sufficient to reduce total fuel consumption by 2%, the increased petrol fuel tax results in a deadweight loss per liter of fuel conserved that is greater than that caused by the diesel fuel tax. This reflects both the high pre-existing tax on petrol fuel and the high own-price elasticities of fuel demand in India. A tax on diesel cars that results in the same diesel market share as the large diesel fuel tax actually has a negative deadweight loss per liter of fuel conserved. The welfare effects of all three policy instruments are positive, once the external benefits of reducing fuel consumption are added to the excess burden of taxation. Published by Elsevier Inc.
机译:我们估算了车辆选择和行驶里程的模型,以分析燃油节省政策对印度汽车市场的长期影响。考虑到汽油和柴油税以及柴油车税与现有汽油税和汽车销售税之间的相互作用,我们模拟了它们的影响。在足以将总燃料消耗减少7%的水平上,增加的柴油和汽油燃料税均导致无谓损失(扣除外部性)约为4(2010)Rs./L。但是,在足以将总燃料消耗减少2%的水平上,增加的汽油燃料税会导致每升所保存的燃料的无谓损失大于柴油税。这既反映了对汽油燃料的既有高额税收,也反映了印度燃料需求的高自身价格弹性。征收与大额柴油税相同的柴油市场份额的柴油车税,实际上每公升燃料节省的载重量为负。一旦减少燃油消耗的外部收益加到了额外的税收负担上,所有这三个政策工具的福利效应都是正面的。由Elsevier Inc.发布

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号