...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of environment informatics >Evaluating Building Systems Energy Performance Superiority and Inferiority Ranking
【24h】

Evaluating Building Systems Energy Performance Superiority and Inferiority Ranking

机译:评估建筑系统能源性能优势和劣势排名

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Nowadays, the demand for sustainable buildings is increasing. The main purpose of buildings is to provide a comfortable living environment for their occupants, considering different aspects including thermal, visual, and acoustic comfort as well as Indoor Air Quality. Decreasing carbon footprint and energy consumption rates while increasing comfort level can help to achieve better living and working environment for building users. This research proposes a framework that aims at improving building system energy performance using building information modeling (BIM) during buildings' design stage by evaluating different alternatives for installed building systems. According to experts' opinions, evaluating buildings' energy performance by analyzing the energy consumption rates alone without including economic and environmental factors is insufficient. Therefore, in this paper, building systems are evaluated using four main criteria; operating cost savings, total energy consumption per year, Lifecycle cost savings, and carbon emissions. A Multiple Criteria Decision-making (MCDM) technique is applied using Superiority and Inferiority Ranking (SIR) to study the behavior of different alternatives. Sensitivity analysis is performed to detect the criticality and effectiveness of the different defined criteria that influence environmental concerns and building system energy performance. A case study is presented to demonstrate the use of the proposed framework on an academic building by considering four criteria which are Operating Costs, Life Cycle Cost, Energy Consumption, and Carbon Emissions. Sensitivity analysis is performed on the weights of the criteria to determine how critical each criterion is and how they affect the ranking of the alternatives. A total of 36 combinations are simulated, considering changing the weights and procedure (SAW vs. TOPSIS). The rank that has the top repetitive percentage is considered to identify the most dominating alternative.
机译:如今,对可持续建筑的需求正在增加。建筑物的主要目的是为其居住者提供舒适的生活环境,考虑到包括热,视觉和声学舒适以及室内空气质量的不同方面。降低碳足迹和能耗率,同时增加舒适程度可以帮助实现建立用户的更好生活和工作环境。本研究提出了一种框架,其旨在通过评估安装建筑系统的不同替代品来改善建筑物设计阶段的建筑信息建模(BIM)来改善建筑系统能量性能。根据专家意见,通过分析单独的能源消费率而不包括经济和环境因素,评估建筑物的能源绩效不足。因此,在本文中,使用四个主要标准进行评估建筑系统;运营成本节约,每年总能耗,生命周期成本节省和碳排放。使用优势和劣势排名(SIR)来研究不同替代方案的特殊标准(MCDM)技术。进行敏感性分析,以检测影响环境问题和构建系统能源性能的不同定义标准的临界性和有效性。提出了一种案例研究以证明通过考虑为运营成本,生命周期成本,能源消耗和碳排放的四个标准来展示在学术建筑上使用所提出的框架。对标准的权重进行灵敏度分析,以确定每个标准是如何批判的以及它们如何影响替代品的排名。考虑到改变权重和程序(SAW与Topsis),总共模拟了36种组合。具有顶级重复百分比的等级被认为是识别最占主导地位的替代方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号