首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environment & Development >Political Opportunity Structures in Dictatorships? Explaining ENGO Existence in Autocratic Regimes
【24h】

Political Opportunity Structures in Dictatorships? Explaining ENGO Existence in Autocratic Regimes

机译:独裁统治的政治机会结构?在专制制度中解释Engo存在

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Which factors make it more likely that environmental nongovernmental organizations (ENGOs) exist in autocracies? Several studies addressed this question before but might suffer from two shortcomings. First, the more general literature on social movements treats nonstate actors as a closely related characteristic of democracies. This neglects, however, that ENGOs might exist in autocracies as well. Second, the more specialized literature on comparative environmental politics examines ENGOs in autocratic regimes but rather focuses on single case studies. Despite fascinating insights, we thus lack a comprehensive theory on why ENGOs might exist in different types of dictatorships. In light of this, the following research adds to this by developing a theory that is based on the political opportunity structures (i.e., degrees of repression) in different autocratic typologies. The empirical analysis using data on 71 autocracies from 1973 to 2003 emphasizes that ENGO existence strongly differs across single-party regimes, monarchies, military regimes, and personalist dictatorships.
机译:哪些因素使得环境非政府组织(ENGOS)更有可能存在于专制中?几项研究之前解决了这个问题,但可能遭受两个缺点。首先,社会运动中越一般的文学将不适合的行为者视为民主国家密切相关的特征。然而,这种忽视也可能存在于专区中的engoS。其次,对比较环境政治的更专业的文献在专制制度中审查了engoS,而是侧重于单一案例研究。尽管有迷人的见解,因此我们缺乏关于为什么EngoS可能存在于不同类型的独裁者中的全面理论。鉴于此,以下研究通过开发基于政治机会结构(即镇压)在不同的专制类型中的理论来补充这一点。从1973年到2003年的71个专制数据的实证分析强调,Engo存在在单方政权,君主制,军事制度和个性派别独裁统治中强烈不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号