...
首页> 外文期刊>Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part J: Journal of Engineering Tribology >Comparison of parametric and profilometric surface analysis methods on machined surfaces
【24h】

Comparison of parametric and profilometric surface analysis methods on machined surfaces

机译:机械加工表面的参数和轮廓分析方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this work, a comparison of three different methods for analysing topographies and roughness on machined metal surfaces is presented. To obtain comparable results, the measurements were done on one and the same set of samples. For this purpose, an atomic force microscope (AFM), a confocal white light microscope, and a scattering light system were used to analyse the topography of samples of the same material, but with the topographies occurring step by step from the grinding process to the polishing process. Based on the results of the investigations with the parametric system (scattering light sensor) and the profilometric systems (AFM, confocal white light microscope), we established a correlation between the roughness parameters and the scattering light parameter. It is shown that the different methods lead to different roughness parameters of the same surface.
机译:在这项工作中,比较了三种用于分析机加工金属表面的形貌和粗糙度的方法。为了获得可比的结果,对一组相同的样品进行了测量。为此,使用了原子力显微镜(AFM),共聚焦白光显微镜和散射光系统来分析同一材料的样品的形貌,但从研磨过程到最终加工过程是逐步发生的。抛光工艺。基于对参数系统(散射光传感器)和轮廓测量系统(AFM,共焦白光显微镜)的研究结果,我们建立了粗糙度参数和散射光参数之间的相关性。结果表明,不同的方法导致同一表面的粗糙度参数不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号