首页> 外文期刊>Journal of engineering education >Diffusion of Engineering Education Innovations: A Survey of Awareness and Adoption Rates in U.S. Engineering Departments
【24h】

Diffusion of Engineering Education Innovations: A Survey of Awareness and Adoption Rates in U.S. Engineering Departments

机译:工程教育创新的扩散:美国工程部门的意识和采用率调查

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Despite decades of effort focused on improvement of engineering education, many recent advances have not resulted in systemic change. Diffusion of innovations theory is used to better understand this phenomenon. Purpose (Hypothesis) Research questions include: How widespread is awareness and adoption of established engineering education innovations? Are there differences by discipline or institutional type? How do engineering department chairs find out about engineering education innovations? What factors do engineering department chairs cite as important in adoption decisions? Design/Method U.S. engineering department chairs were surveyed regarding their awareness and department use of seven engineering education innovations. One hundred ninety-seven usable responses are presented primarily as categorical data with Chi square tests where relevant. Results Overall, the awareness rate was 82 percent, while the adoption rate was 47 percent. Eighty-two percent of engineering departments employ student- active pedagogies (the highest). Mechanical and civil engineering had the highest rates, in part due to many design-related innovations in the survey. Few differences by institution type were evident. In the past, word of mouth and presentations were far more effective than publications in alerting department chairs to the innovations. Department chairs cited financial resources, faculty time and attitudes, and student satisfaction and learning as major considerations in adoption decisions. Conclusions The importance of disciplinary networks was evident during survey administration and in the results. Specific recommendations are offered to employ these networks and the engineering professional societies for future engineering education improvement efforts.
机译:尽管数十年来一直致力于改善工程学教育,但最近的许多进步并未导致系统的变化。创新扩散理论被用来更好地理解这一现象。目的(假设)研究问题包括:对公认的工程教育创新的认识和采用的普及程度如何?学科或机构类型是否存在差异?工程部门主席如何找到有关工程教育创新的信息?工程部门主席在采用决策中认为哪些因素很重要?设计/方法对美国工程部门的主席进行了调查,以了解他们对7种工程教育创新的认识和部门使用情况。一百七十七个可用的响应主要作为相关的卡方检验给出,作为分类数据。结果总体上,知晓率为82%,而采用率为47%。百分之八十二的工程系采用学生活跃的教学法(最高)。机械和土木工程的比率最高,部分原因是调查中进行了许多与设计有关的创新。在机构类型上几乎没有差异。过去,在提醒部门主席注意创新方面,口碑和演讲要比出版物有效得多。系主任将财务资源,教职时间和态度以及学生的满意度和学习作为采用收养决定的主要考虑因素。结论纪律网络的重要性在调查管理和结果中显而易见。提供了一些具体建议,以利用这些网络和工程专业协会进行未来的工程教育改进工作。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of engineering education》 |2010年第3期|p.185-207|共23页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech;

    Office of the Dean of Faculties and Associate Provost, TAMU 1126, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX;

    Department of Mechanical Engineering, 117 Randolph, College of Engineering (0238), Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    change; diffusion of innovations; faculty development;

    机译:更改;创新传播;教师发展;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:58:31

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号