首页> 外文期刊>Journal of engineering education >Indispensable Resource? A Phenomenological Study of Textbook Use in Engineering Problem Solving
【24h】

Indispensable Resource? A Phenomenological Study of Textbook Use in Engineering Problem Solving

机译:必不可少的资源?工程问题解决中教科书使用的现象学研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background Textbooks play an important role in engineering education, influencing instructors' pedagogical approaches and providing much of the information students learn. Research has explored students' recollections of the roles that textbooks played in their educational experiences, but how students actually use textbooks remains largely unexplored. Purpose This phenomenological study describes engineering students' textbook use during problem-solving activities. This study directly examined how students employed a textbook in order to generate detailed descriptions of students' behaviors, approaches, and reflections regarding their actual problem-solving experiences. Method Ten senior materials engineering students (8 males and 2 females) were asked to think aloud while solving engineering problems. Follow-up retrospective interviews regarding die think aloud session were conducted to gain in-depth information on students' textbook use during the problem-solving activities. Results Students used the textbook primarily to find information related to problem constraints that were explicitly stated in the problem. Furthermore, textbook example problems exerted a strong influence on students' problem-solving processes. Students also reported limitations of the textbook, contrasting it to the diversity of resources available via the Internet. Conclusions This study provides insight into students' textbook use during engineering problem-solving activities. Students' limited application of the textbook during problem solving suggests that textbooks may not be serving their intended purposes.
机译:背景教科书在工程教育中起着重要作用,影响教师的教学方法,并提供许多学生学习的信息。研究已经探索了学生对教科书在其教育经历中所起的作用的回忆,但是在很大程度上,如何实际使用教科书尚待探索。目的这项现象学研究描述了解决问题的活动期间工科学生的教科书使用情况。这项研究直接检查了学生如何使用教科书来详细描述学生的行为,方法以及关于他们实际解决问题的经验的思考。方法要求十名高级材料工程专业的学生(男8名,女2名)在解决工程问题时大声思考。进行了有关“大声思考”会议的后续回顾性访谈,以获取有关在解决问题活动中学生使用教科书的深入信息。结果学生主要使用教科书来查找与问题约束明确相关的信息。此外,教科书示例问题对学生的问题解决过程也有很大的影响。学生们还报告了该教科书的局限性,将其与互联网上可用资源的多样性形成对比。结论本研究为学生在工程解决问题的活动中使用教科书提供了见识。在解决问题的过程中,学生对教科书的使用有限,这表明教科书可能无法达到预期目的。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of engineering education》 |2013年第2期|269-288|共20页
  • 作者单位

    Institute for STEM Education, California State University East Bay, 25800 Carlos Bee Blvd., Hayward, CA, 94542;

    University of Colorado Boulder and Colorado Mesa University Mechanical Engineering Partnership Program, 2510 Foresight Center, Grand Junction, CO 81505;

    Engineering Education at the University of Florida, 100 Rhines Hall, P.O. Box 116400, Gainesville, FL 32611-6400;

    University of Florida, 119A Norman Hall, P.O. Box 117047, Gainesville, FL, 32611-0747;

    University of Florida, 119 Norman Hall, P.O. Box 117047, Gainesville, FL 32611;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    textbook; problem solving; phenomenology;

    机译:教科书;解决问题;现象学;
  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 13:56:09

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号