首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Energy Storage >Multi-criteria evaluation of energy storage technologies based on hesitant fuzzy information: A case study for Turkey
【24h】

Multi-criteria evaluation of energy storage technologies based on hesitant fuzzy information: A case study for Turkey

机译:基于犹豫不决的模糊信息的能量存储技术的多标准评估 - 以土耳其为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Energy storage technologies (ESTs) enable to cope with intermittency of energy sources by storing excess energy to use when it is needed. Therefore, evaluation of energy storage alternatives (or technologies) is completely critical and can be exactly considered as a multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) problem. It is clear that we have to evaluate this problem in terms of both qualitative and quantitative criteria. We should also take into account decision makers' linguistic evaluations and their experiences. At this point, the fuzzy set theory (FST) that is an effective tool to utilize from human judgments and linguistic evaluations in the decision making process can be successfully used. Hesitant fuzzy sets (HFSs) that enable to have several membership values between 0 and 1 for an element of the set can be used for this aim as an extension of ordinary fuzzy sets. In this paper, an integrated MCDM model consists of Delphi, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and VIsekriterijumska Optimizcija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) methods has been proposed to evaluate EST alternatives for Turkey under hesitant fuzzy environment. For this aim, a hierarchical decision model consisting of four main criteria and nineteen sub-criteria with nine EST alternatives has been constructed. While hesitant fuzzy AHP (HF-AHP) method has been utilized to determine weights of criteria, the alternatives have been ranked by using hesitant fuzzy VIKOR (HF-VIKOR) method. A sensitivity analysis based on change of some parameters has been also performed to analyze the obtained results and to demonstrate sensitiveness of the proposed MCDM model. A comparative analysis has been also realized to confirm the validity of the proposed fuzzy based methodology. For this aim, hesitant fuzzy Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (HF-TOPSIS) method has been applied as another distance-based methodology. One of the obtained results of this study is that the criteria economic and technical have been determined as the most and the least important main criteria and the weights of them have been achieved as 0.342 and 0.203, respectively. Additionally, the alternative EST named "Compressed Air" has been determined as the most suitable energy storage technology alternative for Turkey.
机译:能量存储技术(ESTS)通过存储多余的能量来应对能源的间歇性,以便在需要时使用。因此,对能量存储替代品(或技术)的评估是完全关键的,可以被完全被视为多标准决策(MCDM)问题。很明显,我们必须在定性和定量标准方面评估这个问题。我们还应考虑到决策者的语言评估及其经验。此时,可以成功使用是利用人为判断的有效工具和决策过程中的语言评估的模糊集理论(FST)。犹豫不决的模糊集(HFSS)能够在该集合元素中具有0和1之间的若​​干会员值,可以用于此目的作为普通模糊集的扩展。在本文中,已经提出了一个集成的MCDM模型由Delphi,分析层次流程(AHP)和VISEKriterijumska Optimizcija i Kompromisno Resenje(Vikor)方法评估了土耳其在犹豫模糊环境下的Est替代品。为此目的,已经构建了由具有九个EST替代品的四个主要标准和19个子标准组成的层次决策模型。虽然已经利用了犹豫不决的模糊AHP(HF-AHP)方法来确定标准的权重,但备选方案已经通过使用犹豫不决的模糊Vikor(HF-Vikor)方法来排名。还已经进行了基于一些参数的变化的灵敏度分析来分析所获得的结果,并展示所提出的MCDM模型的敏感性。还已经意识到了比较分析以确认所提出的模糊基础方法的有效性。为此目的,通过相似性与理想解决方案(HF-TOPSIS)方法的顺序偏好的犹豫不决的模糊技术被应用为另一种基于距离的方法。本研究的其中一个结果是,经济和技术标准已被确定为最多,最重要的主要标准,它们的重量分别为0.342和0.203。此外,名为“压缩空气”的替代EST已被确定为土耳其最合适的储能技术替代品。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号