首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Energy Resources Technology >Challenges During Shallow and Deep Carbonate Reservoirs Stimulation
【24h】

Challenges During Shallow and Deep Carbonate Reservoirs Stimulation

机译:浅层和深层碳酸盐岩储层刺激过程中的挑战

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Carbonate reservoir stimulation has been carried out for years using HCl or HCl-based fluids. High HCl concentration should not be used when the well completion has Cr-based alloy in which the protective layer is chrome oxide which is very soluble in HCl. HCl or its based fluids are not recommended either in shallow reservoirs where the fracture pressure is low (face dissolution) or in deep reservoirs where it will cause severe corrosion problems to the well tubular. Different chelating agents have been proposed to be used as alternatives to HCl in the cases that HCl cannot be used. Chelating agents, such as HEDTA (hydroxyl ethylene diamine triacetic acid) and GLDA (glutamic -N, N-diacetic acid), have been used to stimulate carbonate cores. The benefits of chelating agents over HCl are the low reaction, low leak-off rate, and low corrosion rates. In this study, the different equations and parameters that can be used in matrix acid treatment were summarized to scale up the laboratory conditions to the field conditions. The conditions where HCl or chelating agents can be used were optimized and in this paper. The leak-off rate was determined using the data from coreflood experiments and computed tomography (CT) scans. Indiana limestone cores of average permeability of 1 md and core lengths of 6 and 20 in. were used in this study. Chelating agents will be used at pH value of 4 and at concentration of 0.6M, and their performance will be compared with the 15 wt.% HCl. The experimental results showed that HCl has high leak-off rate and caused face dissolution at low injection rate. The model to scale up the linear coreflood results to radial field conditions was developed and can be used to design for the optimum conditions of the matrix acid treatments. Chelating agents can be used to stimulate shallow reservoirs in which HCl may cause face dissolution, because they can penetrate deep with less volume and also they can be used in deep reservoirs where HCl may cause severe corrosion to the well tubular.
机译:碳酸盐岩储层的增产已经使用HCl或HCl基流体进行了多年。当完井采用Cr基合金制成且保护层为非常易溶于HCl的氧化铬时,不应使用高HCl浓度。不建议在裂缝压力低(表层溶解)的浅层储层中或会给井管造成严重腐蚀问题的深层储层中使用HCl或其基液。在不能使用HCl的情况下,已经提出了不同的螯合剂可以替代HCl。螯合剂,如HEDTA(羟基乙二胺三乙酸)和GLDA(谷氨酸-N,N-二乙酸),已被用来刺激碳酸盐岩心。螯合剂比HCl的好处是反应低,泄漏率低和腐蚀速率低。在这项研究中,总结了可用于基质酸处理的不同方程式和参数,以将实验室条件扩大到现场条件。在本文中优化了可使用HCl或螯合剂的条件。使用岩心驱替实验和计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描的数据确定泄漏率。在这项研究中,印第安纳州石灰岩岩心的平均渗透率为1 md,岩心长度为6和20 in.。螯合剂将在4的pH值和0.6M的浓度下使用,其性能将与15 wt%的HCl进行比较。实验结果表明,HCl具有较高的泄漏率,在低注入速率下会导致面溶。开发了将线性岩心驱替结果按比例放大到径向场条件的模型,该模型可用于设计基质酸处理的最佳条件。螯合剂可用于刺激可能会导致面溶的HCl的浅层储层,因为它们可以以较小的体积渗入深层,并且也可用于HCl可能对井管造成严重腐蚀的深层储层中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号